{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"I4CE","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.i4ce.org\/en\/","author_name":"dev_newround","author_url":"https:\/\/www.i4ce.org\/en\/author\/dev_newround\/","title":"Review of monitoring uncertainty requirements in the CDM - I4CE","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yHQ8Mep4vG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.i4ce.org\/en\/publication\/review-of-monitoring-uncertainty-requirements-in-the-cdm\/\">Review of monitoring uncertainty requirements in the CDM<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.i4ce.org\/en\/publication\/review-of-monitoring-uncertainty-requirements-in-the-cdm\/embed\/#?secret=yHQ8Mep4vG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Review of monitoring uncertainty requirements in the CDM&#8221; &#8212; I4CE\" data-secret=\"yHQ8Mep4vG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.i4ce.org\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.i4ce.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/14-10-CDC-Climat-R-WP-14-16-Monitoring-uncertainty-in-the-CDM-pdf-image-2.jpg","thumbnail_width":595,"thumbnail_height":842,"description":"By Igor Shishlov and Valentin Bellassen In order to ensure the environmental integrity of carbon offset projects, emission reductions certified under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) have to be \u2018real, measurable and additional\u2019, which is ensured through the monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) process. MRV, however, comes at a cost that ranges from several cents [&hellip;]"}