{"id":65670,"date":"2024-03-07T18:18:20","date_gmt":"2024-03-07T17:18:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.i4ce.org\/?post_type=publication&p=65670"},"modified":"2024-04-11T12:32:21","modified_gmt":"2024-04-11T10:32:21","slug":"financing-coal-phase-out-public-development-banks-role-early-retirement-coal-plants-climate","status":"publish","type":"publication","link":"https:\/\/www.i4ce.org\/en\/publication\/financing-coal-phase-out-public-development-banks-role-early-retirement-coal-plants-climate\/","title":{"rendered":"Financing Coal Phase-out: Public Development Banks\u2019 Role in the Early Retirement of Coal Plants"},"content":{"rendered":"

Public development banks have the potential to <\/span>facilitate<\/span> the transition from coal to renewable alternatives in developing and emerging countries by fostering conditions conducive to the early retirement and repurposing of coal plants. Co-written with <\/span><\/span>NewClimate Institute<\/span><\/span><\/a>, this report highlights the challenges associated with the early retirement of coal plants and examines public development banks’ role in collaborating with national governments and power producers to support coal phase-out.<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Limiting global average temperature rise to 1.5\u00b0C requires stopping the construction of new coal power plants and the early retirement of a large number of existing plants before the end of their technical lifetimes. This presents a major challenge as coal supplied more than one-third of global electricity generation in 2023, with Southeast Asia, China, and India accounting for the largest share of current coal capacity in operation. Early retirement of coal assets, coupled with the expansion of renewable energy, is crucial to advance the decarbonisation of the global power sector. Early retirement can facilitate significant emissions reduction and holds economic and sustainable development advantages. Given the diminishing cost of renewables and energy storage and the potential for public health benefits, there is an overwhelming case for swiftly phasing out coal in line with long-term decarbonisation pathways. However, there are a number of barriers to the phase-out of existing plants that prevent market forces in favour of renewables and limit sustainable development gains.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

A growing number of policymakers and public development banks, including multilateral development banks and other bilateral development finance institutions, are actively exploring strategies to accelerate the retirement of existing coal plants, extending beyond the exclusion of coal from direct financial support. With the support public development banks can provide, from advisory services and technical assistance to different forms of financing, they are uniquely positioned to help address these barriers and support countries with the transition to decarbonised electricity systems. However, these efforts may carry risks of unintended adverse impacts, such as indirectly supporting new natural gas capacity. Other forms of engagement, such as transition finance and compensation payments, may also pose unique risks depending on how they are used. The risks include moral hazard and inefficient use of public funds, and setting perverse incentives, which could impede coal phase-out.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I4<\/span>CE<\/strong> and <\/span>NewClimate Institute <\/span>review<\/span>ed<\/span> the instruments that public development banks have at their disposal to help address barriers and the <\/span>associated challenges and risk<\/span>s, and examined existing phase-out initiatives as case studies. Our work underscores the importance of seeking firm commitments from partner country governments and other stakeholders to stop future fossil fuel investments, reduce current pipelines to avoid emission leakage and moral hazard risks, and prevent backtracking on coal phase-out in the event of political turnover. We break down the instruments by the stakeholders that public development banks may engage with, considering their different roles in the power system: national policymakers, utilities, and independent power producers (IPPs). National policymakers are the ultimate decisionmakers on a country\u2019s fossil fuel phase-out ambition and power system reforms; therefore, engagement often aims to strengthen policymaking and support ambition. On the other hand, engagement with power producers, whether utilities or IPPs, also requires a different approach to address distinct transition barriers. Based on a review of existing literature and interviews with experts and practitioners, the main considerations for public development banks when engaging in coal phase-out efforts are: \u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

When engaging with national governments, public development banks should:\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n