Publications

Climate Report n° 50 « Mitigating climate change and waste recycling: household packaging case study »

14 June 2015 - By : Vivian DEPOUES, PhD

• The waste sector has consistently poor visibility when it comes to GHG  inventories. Its true impact can only be understood through a comprehensive life-cycle assessment methodology. It is only then that the actual effectiveness of waste prevention and recycling in mitigating GHG  emissions becomes clear.

• This Climate Report examines the principle of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) through the example of household packaging in France. 3.2 Mt of packaging is recycled every year, resulting in a 2.1 Mt reduction in GHG emissions. This outcome is achieved through the involvement of all stakeholders. Reductions in waste treatment and the reuse of recycled materials are the principle sources of this reduction. Reusing recycled materials has even become a competitive option in a market based on the original EPR economic model, primarily financed by producers. The positive climate impact is a co-benefit of the recycling target, which relies both on sorting by consumers and the household waste management organization of local authorities

• The report details the connections between the model’s financial incentives and measures to reduce emissions at each stage. It stresses that the potential for mitigation associated with processing household packaging could be intensified as part of a transition to a circular economy. Success depends on improved policy coordination—especially at local level—and heightened visibility of co-benefits with regard to climate issues.

Climate Report n° 50 « Mitigating climate change and waste recycling: household packaging case study » Download
I4CE Contacts
Vivian DEPOUES, PhD
Vivian DEPOUES, PhD
Research Lead – Adaptation to climate change Email
To learn more
  • 12/04/2025 Blog post
    Relaxing EU standards on CO2 emissions won’t save the EU’s automotive industry, or help consumers

    Recently, car manufacturers have been calling for a relaxation of CO2 emission standards for cars and vans and the 2035 phase-out target for new internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, by including some flexibilities. They point in particular to the crisis the industry has faced in recent years, growing competitive pressure from China, and insufficient demand for electric vehicles (EVs) in Europe, as reasons for the sector needing more time for the transition required to meet the targets. As the European Commission (EC) prepares to publish its package for the automotive industry, including a revision of CO₂ standards for cars and vans, this blogpost examines the realities behind the difficulties currently faced by car manufacturers and the consequences of relaxing and postponing the planned EU regulations for this sector. 

  • 12/04/2025 Blog post
    Maintaining the 2035 target to support the transition of the French automobile industry

    With the aim to reduce its CO2 emissions and costly fossil-fuel imports, in 2022 the European Parliament adopted a rule that, from 2035, all new vehicles must be zero-emission, which essentially means that they must be electric. However, this rule is now being questioned, with car manufacturers requesting that it be revised to allow plug-in […]

  • 11/28/2025 Foreword of the week
    COP30: The missed turn to implementation – and the coalitions moving ahead anyway

    COP30 concluded with an agreement, proving that multilateralism is still alive. However, the results are underwhelming: no push to transition away from fossil fuels, no decision on deforestation, and mixed outcomes on adaptation metrics.  On climate finance, Belém failed to shift from ambition to implementation. Negotiations quickly drifted back to a battle on yet another high-level quantitative target. The decision to triple adaptation funding by 2035 disappointed many, with its distant time horizon, lack of baseline and non-binding wording. COP30 also missed the opportunity to engage with – and build consensus around – concrete measures outlined in the Baku to Belém roadmap to get to $1.3 trillion. Instead, it defaulted to launching new processes – a work programme on climate finance and a ministerial roundtable on the NCQG.  

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer