CARBON OFFSET PROJECTS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR

28 December 2011 - Climate Report - By : Claudine FOUCHEROT

By Claudine FOUCHEROT et Valentin BELLASSEN

The agricultural sector accounts for 14% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. If we also take into account carbon emissions and sequestration from upstream – production of fertilisers, deforestation, etc. – and downstream – bio-energies, etc. – the share rises to 30%. Many practices and technologies enable agriculture’s impact on climate change to be reduced. According to a number of estimates that are summarised in this research, the agricultural sector’s mitigation potential is of the same order of magnitude as its emissions over a period of 30 years. However, changing agricultural practices comes at a cost, and in most cases such changes are not made without economic incentives.

Carbon offsetting projects are one of the economic tools available to reduce agricultural emissions by paying for metric tons of avoided CO2e emissions. A summary of the emission reductions enabled by agricultural projects to date is provided in this report. It covers most projects certified by quality assurance standards, including those set up by the Kyoto Protocol (Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Implementation) and those in the voluntary market (Verified Carbon Standard, Climate Action Reserve, Gold Standard, Chicago Climate Exchange, and American Carbon Registry). The assessment drawn up on this basis shows that emission reductions enabled through carbon offsetting are thousand times lower than actual emissions and their potential mitigation. Agricultural projects have reduced emissions by 14 MtCO2e in 2010, i.e. 7% of the reductions generated by all carbon offset projects across all sectors for this year.

Initiatives focus on three technologies: bio-energies (crop residues), methanisation of livestock waste, and soil carbon sequestration using no-till practices. This is very little compared with the large number of mitigation technologies that could be used in this sector. The diffuse nature of agricultural emissions and the cost of the abatement measures are the main obstacles to developing agricultural projects. However, the introduction of multi-farm aggregators enables to share costs. Moreover, research on new techniques for measuring emissions more efficiently and less costly is a mean to overcome these obstacles and release the mitigation potential.

CARBON OFFSET PROJECTS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR Download

I4CE Contacts

Claudine FOUCHEROT

Program Director – Agriculture and Forestry Email

To learn more

04/25/2024
I4CE’s recommendations to the European Banking Authority on prudential transition plans

The European Banking Authority (EBA) is clarifying how the banks should frame their “transition plan” as required by the EU prudential regulation. The transition plan is the bank’s strategic roadmap to prepare for the transition to a sustainable economy as framed by the jurisdictions they operate in, including an EU climate-neutral economy. It has been introduced in several EU regulatory frameworks, including as a disclosure requirement arising from the CSRD. The prudential framework and the EBA are focusing on a specific angle: how the banks plan to manage their financial risks related to the transition. EBA’s framing of these plans will be key to determine whether the banks will manage their financial risks consistently with the broader need of financing the transition to a low-carbon economy.
04/19/2024 Foreword of the week
World bank and IMF Spring Meetings: How can the reformed institutions play a leading role in funding the transition?

Rethinking how development can be financed to take into account the rising challenges of our time is a fastidious task, especially when thousands of experts, decision makers and practitioners want to leave their print. The outline of the new international financial architecture is being debated again this week, with more questions open for discussion than consensus on the answers.
04/19/2024 Blog post
More and better finance: maximising positive climate impacts for a timely transition

Since the Paris Agreement in 2015, significant strides have been made to foster the commitment of countries and financial institutions to address the climate crisis and ensure that climate risks and opportunities are considered in investments. However, with emissions required to peak before 2025, our window of opportunity is rapidly closing to keep +1.5°C within reach. Financial needs to lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and to address adaptation priorities are increasing rapidly in the meantime. Luis Zamarioli Santos and Diana Cárdenas Monar, from I4CE, believe that commitment must urgently translate into action, and action must bring the urgent change the world needs. Both governments and public financial institutions have a central role to play to deliver more and better finance, maximising positive impacts. This blogpost highlights some opportunities to advance in the path for a systemic transformation, involving key stakeholders with a whole-economy approach.

CARBON OFFSET PROJECTS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR

Claudine FOUCHEROT

I4CE’s recommendations to the European Banking Authority on prudential transition plans

World bank and IMF Spring Meetings: How can the reformed institutions play a leading role in funding the transition?

More and better finance: maximising positive climate impacts for a timely transition