Publications Agriculture and food

Does more sustainable food increase consumer budgets?

14 October 2021 - Climate Brief - By : Lucile ROGISSART / Valentin BELLASSEN / Claudine FOUCHEROT

Consuming less animal products and wasting less lighten the budget, but increasing consumption of organic products adds to it. In total, does adopting a sustainable diet increase or decrease consumer spending?

 

Report available in French only

 

While some studies give a clear-cut answer to this question, it actually varies according to at least three factors:

  • The ambition of the sustainable diet: the level of substitution between animal and plant proteins, the share of sustainably produced products (which is simplified to organic), and the level of waste reduction;
  • The economic conditions, in particular the price of organic products compared to conventional products;
  • The initial base of consumers and the prices at which they buy their products, which are strongly correlated with income.

 

I4CE has developed a calculator to measure the effects of each of these factors on the household food budget. Depending on the level of these parameters, the transition to a more sustainable diet can range from a 30% gain to an additional 67% of the consumer’s initial food budget. People with the lowest incomes have the highest potential additional costs.

 

At current prices, regardless of reductions in animal products and waste, consuming mostly organic food is more expensive, especially for the poorest households. The price premium for organic over conventional would have to fall from 65% today to 10% for all households to be able to adopt a less meaty 100% organic diet without increasing their budget.

 

If a high consumption of organic products is targeted, public policies must therefore manage the tension between remunerative prices for sustainable farming practices and an increase in food expenditure acceptable to households.

Click on this button to see the graphic

Does more sustainable food increase consumer budgets? Download
I4CE Contacts
Lucile ROGISSART
Lucile ROGISSART
Research Fellow – Financing the agricultural transition, Food systems Email
To learn more
  • 02/19/2026 Blog post
    Food sovereignty relies on ecological planning

    The upcoming food sovereignty conferences are likely to shape debates on the future of French agriculture in 2026. The main responses provided over the past two years can be summarised as follows: remove production constraints to produce more of everything (both animal and plant products), to recover market shares in France and abroad. Seeking to produce more of everything without considering adaptation or transition is a form of denial, at a time when climate change is hitting farmers hard and regularly, and when our dependence on imported fertilisers and oilseed meals undermines our sovereignty. The conferences must take these considerations into account — otherwise, they will serve only to perpetuate the notion of an illusory sovereignty. 

  • 02/19/2026
    Which production assets for more resilient and sustainable agricultural and food sectors? Which investment needs? Which stranded assets?

    Les choix d’investissements des secteurs agricoles et alimentaires des années à venir sont déterminants. Pour pérenniser leurs productions et faire face aux crises, les secteurs agricoles et alimentaires français doivent évoluer vers des systèmes plus résilients et durables. L’enjeu est d’autant plus crucial que différentes vagues d’investissements sont en cours ou à venir dans ces secteurs. Dans cette étude, I4CE a estimé qu’environ 100 milliards d’euros d’outils de production agricoles et alimentaires sont affectés par la transition. Une coordination et une planification des investissements semblent incontournables, notamment pour en limiter les coûts.

  • 01/23/2026 Foreword of the week
    Financing carbon farming practices: lessons learnt in France can reinforce the EU level initiatives

    In a challenging economic and political context, especially for the agriculture sector, some incentive schemes can still help bring stakeholders together in climate transition and resilience initiatives. This is the case with carbon certification schemes, which both ensure the credibility of the climate impact of the actions implemented and provide remuneration for farmers and foresters for changes in practices. Some of these measures, such as replacing mineral fertilisers (mostly imported) with organic fertilisers, also help to meet the sector’s needs for resilience and strategic independence, which are crucial in the current context.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer