Menu
FR
search
Publications Europe Energy transition Cleantech

OPEN LETTER: Cleantech R&I must sit at the heart of the EU’s Competitiveness Agenda

21 May 2025 - Special issues - By : Ciarán HUMPHREYS

With Member States meeting this week to discuss the progress and future of EU R&I funding at the Competitiveness Council a group of civil society, research and cleantech organisations, including I4CE, have today issued an open letter urging EU policymakers to put clean technology research and innovation (R&I) at the centre of the bloc’s long-term competitiveness strategy.

 

The letter, addressed to key figures in the European Commission, the European Parliament, and national permanent representations to the EU, comes at a pivotal moment in the debate over the EU’s next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and the future of its flagship research programme, Horizon Europe.

 

With the debate on the integration of the Framework Programme into the proposed Competitiveness Fund in full swing, the signatories call for policymakers to keep one thing in mind: Europe’s long-term excellence in research and innovation depends on the availability of a powerful, stable, and predictable R&I framework and funding toolbox to support the innovators building Europe’s future.

 

The letter outlines 8 key principles for placing cleantech R&I at the core of FP10:

 

  • Boost the EU R&I budget to €220 billion – Chronic oversubscription in Horizon Europe has left too many high-quality projects unfunded. A significantly expanded budget, ringfenced for R&I and with a dedicated cleantech stream, is essential for long-term competitiveness.

 

  • Bridge the cleantech “valley of death” – More funding is needed for demonstration and scale-up stages. EU and national funds must work together, including enabling Member States to top up scale-up projects via cohesion funds.

 

  • Prioritise strategic technologies – R&I should target high-impact technologies that support EU climate and industrial goals—such as innovative renewables, energy storage, grid technologies, low-carbon construction, and carbon removal.

 

  • Protect and grow the European Innovation Council (EIC) – The EIC has proven effective at leveraging private investment into cleantech. Its independence must be preserved and its budget increased to support scale-up success.

 

  • Strengthen public-private partnerships – These are key to aligning research with industrial needs. The next Framework Programme should expand their use, especially in underfunded cleantech sectors.

 

  • Support collaborative R&I under Pillar II – Cross-border projects under Pillar II drive real European added value. At least 50% of FP10’s budget should continue to fund this collaborative research.

 

  • Use innovation procurement to create lead markets – The EU and Member States should embrace procurement as a tool to bring breakthrough technologies to market faster, in line with the NZIA and Heitor report.

 

  • Align regulation with innovation – Regulatory sandboxes and innovation-linked tender criteria should be deployed to help new technologies scale and shape future EU industrial policy.
OPEN LETTER: Cleantech R&I must sit at the heart of the EU’s Competitiveness Agenda Download
I4CE Contacts
Ciarán HUMPHREYS
Ciarán HUMPHREYS
 Research Fellow – Cleantech, Financial instruments for climate innovation Email
To learn more
  • 01/21/2026 Blog post
    On Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming the devil is in…the demand

    The implementation of carbon farming practices on European farms and in European forests is a lever for achieving carbon neutrality, but also for farm resilience, the adaptation of forest stands to climate change and for contributing to our strategic independence. Certifying and financing low-carbon practices is the objective of the CRCF (Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming) regulation, which will come into effect in 2026. Now seems the right time to draw lessons from six years of experience with a similar standard in France: the “Label Bas-Carbone” (Low Carbon Label – LBC). The results show that striking a balance between scientific rigour and accessibility for stakeholders has led to the development of a substantial range of projects. However, the real challenge is to build sufficient and appropriate demand to finance the projects. There is no miracle solution, but complementary financing channels may emerge. 

  • 12/12/2025 Blog post Foreword of the week
    Paris +10: France and Europe must step up on climate – to protect our security, sovereignty, competitiveness, and public finances

    How distant December 12, 2015 now seems. All delegations at COP21 had then rallied behind Laurent Fabius’s little green hammer. Ten years later, the trend is closer to backlash. Climate action is now often portrayed in the public debate as too costly, because it requires major investment. Ineffective, since our share of global emissions is small. Unfair, because it cuts into purchasing power. Too divisive, supported only by part of the electorate. Too late, since keeping the planet below +2°C of warming now seems out of reach. Arguments that are partly true—yet require substantial nuance. 

  • 12/05/2025 Foreword of the week
    Maintaining the 2035 target: Ensuring a viable future for Europe’s automotive industry

    In the run up to the publication of the European Commission’s proposals for an automotive package on 10 December, car manufactures have stepped up the calls to relax the CO2 standards and the 2035 phase-out of new combustion-engine vehicles by including some flexibilities. They highlight the challenges the industry has faced in recent years, growing competitive pressure from China, and insufficient demand for electric vehicles in Europe as reasons for the sector needing more time for the transition required to meet the targets.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer