Events

Around the world in carbon markets: Emissions Trading Case Studies

  • Date: 1st December, 1.15pm – 2.15pm
  • Location: IETA Pavilion, Business Hub Room Paris
  • Partner(s):  IETA and Environmental Defense Fund

 

The event discussed carbon market experiences and challenges in Europe, North America and emerging countries based on a series of case studies published by IETA, EDF and I4CE in 2015.

 

Key messages:

  • Benoit Leguet, Managing Director, I4CE: Since 2014, the EU ETS has been successful in over achieving its 2020 emission reduction target and complementary policies have played a significant role in reducing emissions. The next step will be to recalibrate the scheme with the Market Stability Reserve, a new adjustment mechanism, voted in 2015 and to endorse EU ETS 2030 ambition based on the -43% target compared to 2005. View Benoit’s presentation.
  • Derek Walker, Associate Vice President, EDF:  In California; although GDP has increased by 4-5 % since the implementation of the cap-and-trade program. CO2 emissions among covered entities have reduced by 2% proving that economic growth can be decoupled from emissions growth.
  • Jeff Swartz, Director International Policy, IETA: Chinese ETS pilots and the future national ETS (2017) may encourage the emergence of more carbon pricing initiatives by reducing regional competitiveness concerns. However before this, it is imperative that the right MRV framework is implemented to ensure reliability and effectiveness. View Jeff’s presentation.
  • Vikram Widge, Head of Climate Finance and Policy, World Bank Group: Carbon pricing initiatives are essential and ETS is an effective way to achieve a GHG emission reduction goal. A plug-and-play market based mechanism can help countries take measurable actions that are recognized internationally. View Vikram’s presentation.

 

Found more information about our carbon pricing policy case studies

01 Dec 2015

Around the world in carbon markets: Emissions Trading Case Studies

To learn more
  • 02/19/2026 Blog post
    Food sovereignty relies on ecological planning

    The upcoming food sovereignty conferences are likely to shape debates on the future of French agriculture in 2026. The main responses provided over the past two years can be summarised as follows: remove production constraints to produce more of everything (both animal and plant products), to recover market shares in France and abroad. Seeking to produce more of everything without considering adaptation or transition is a form of denial, at a time when climate change is hitting farmers hard and regularly, and when our dependence on imported fertilisers and oilseed meals undermines our sovereignty. The conferences must take these considerations into account — otherwise, they will serve only to perpetuate the notion of an illusory sovereignty. 

  • 02/19/2026
    Which production assets for more resilient and sustainable agricultural and food sectors? Which investment needs? Which stranded assets?

    Les choix d’investissements des secteurs agricoles et alimentaires des années à venir sont déterminants. Pour pérenniser leurs productions et faire face aux crises, les secteurs agricoles et alimentaires français doivent évoluer vers des systèmes plus résilients et durables. L’enjeu est d’autant plus crucial que différentes vagues d’investissements sont en cours ou à venir dans ces secteurs. Dans cette étude, I4CE a estimé qu’environ 100 milliards d’euros d’outils de production agricoles et alimentaires sont affectés par la transition. Une coordination et une planification des investissements semblent incontournables, notamment pour en limiter les coûts.

  • 01/23/2026 Foreword of the week
    Financing carbon farming practices: lessons learnt in France can reinforce the EU level initiatives

    In a challenging economic and political context, especially for the agriculture sector, some incentive schemes can still help bring stakeholders together in climate transition and resilience initiatives. This is the case with carbon certification schemes, which both ensure the credibility of the climate impact of the actions implemented and provide remuneration for farmers and foresters for changes in practices. Some of these measures, such as replacing mineral fertilisers (mostly imported) with organic fertilisers, also help to meet the sector’s needs for resilience and strategic independence, which are crucial in the current context.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer