The 2023 adaptation finance gap update and emerging lessons and best practice on how to bridge the gap

Webinars - By : Vivian DEPOUES, PhD

 

I4CE at Adaptation Futures 2023 (October 2-6, 2023)

Held every two years, Adaptation Futures is the leading international conference dedicated to adaptation to climate change. It brings together researchers, decision-makers, practitioners and companies working on adaptation from all over the world. In 2023, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), in partnership with Ouranos and the Government of Canada, is organizing the 7th edition in Montreal.   

 

I4CE will be present throughout the week, with two highlights co-organized with our partners: 

 

  • the 2023 adaptation finance gap update and emerging lessons and best practice on how to bridge the gap;
  • “South”, the new frontiers of adaptation in the “North”? see more informations about this event

 

Date: October 6th, 2023

Time: 08.30-10.00 AM (UTC-4) // 02.30-04.00 PM (CEST)

Format : in person and online

Partners : Paul Watkiss Associates

Description of the event

This proposed knowledge sharing session presented the new findings of the Adaptation Finance Gap analysis 2023. The format was based on a series of short presentations, followed by an interactive discussion session on how to bridge the gap. The adaptation finance gap is defined as the difference between the estimated costs of meeting a given adaptation target and the amount of finance available (UNEP, 2014).

 

Based on a combination of global and national studies, the UNEP adaptation gap report (AGR) estimated the annual costs / financial needs for adaptation in developing countries at between US$ 160 billion and US$ 340 billion by 2030 (UNEP, 2016).

 

With increasing levels of climate change, this annual cost was projected to increase to between US$ 315 billion and US$ 565 billion by 2050. The most recent gap report (UNEP, 2022) suggests that for developing countries, the estimated adaptation costs – and likely adaptation financing needs – could be five to 10 times greater than current international adaptation finance flows (as reported by OECD, 2022).

 

These adaptation cost estimates were produced in 2015. Much has changed since then, with improved academic studies and country submissions. A major update of the costs of adaptation is being undertaken in 2023. This research will update the estimates of the costs of adaptation, the estimated financing needs from developing countries, and the levels of finance flows. This will be used to estimate the size of the adaptation finance gap. This new gap estimate has extremely high relevance for the new collective, quantified goal on climate finance.

 

This session presented the headline research findings from the updated AGR 2023 study. It presented and discussed the updated estimates, providing details of various evidence lines (costs of adaptation, country financial needs from NDCs and NAPs, adaptation finance flows), and present and discussed the implications of these new estimates for the adaptation finance gap.

 

This session discussed how different countries and organizations are tackling this challenge. We presented the work developed in France as part of our most recent projects (Quanti-Adapt et Economic implications of adaptation pathways). 

 

Speakers: 

  • Vivian Dépoues (I4CE) ;
  • Paul Watkiss and Blanche Butera (Paul Watkiss Associates) ;
  • Henry Neufeldt (PNUE) ; 
  • Dipesh Chapagain (Oxfam) ; 
  • Georgia Savvidouu (Chalmers University of Technology). 

 

06 Oct 2023

The 2023 adaptation finance gap update and emerging lessons and best practice on how to bridge the gap

I4CE Contacts
Vivian DEPOUES, PhD
Vivian DEPOUES, PhD
Research Lead – Adaptation to climate change Email
To learn more
  • 01/23/2026 Foreword of the week
    Financing carbon farming practices: lessons learnt in France can reinforce the EU level initiatives

    In a challenging economic and political context, especially for the agriculture sector, some incentive schemes can still help bring stakeholders together in climate transition and resilience initiatives. This is the case with carbon certification schemes, which both ensure the credibility of the climate impact of the actions implemented and provide remuneration for farmers and foresters for changes in practices. Some of these measures, such as replacing mineral fertilisers (mostly imported) with organic fertilisers, also help to meet the sector’s needs for resilience and strategic independence, which are crucial in the current context.

  • 01/21/2026 Blog post
    On Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming the devil is in…the demand

    The implementation of carbon farming practices on European farms and in European forests is a lever for achieving carbon neutrality, but also for farm resilience, the adaptation of forest stands to climate change and for contributing to our strategic independence. Certifying and financing low-carbon practices is the objective of the CRCF (Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming) regulation, which will come into effect in 2026. Now seems the right time to draw lessons from six years of experience with a similar standard in France: the “Label Bas-Carbone” (Low Carbon Label – LBC). The results show that striking a balance between scientific rigour and accessibility for stakeholders has led to the development of a substantial range of projects. However, the real challenge is to build sufficient and appropriate demand to finance the projects. There is no miracle solution, but complementary financing channels may emerge. 

  • 01/16/2026 Blog post
    CBAM and fertilisers: ring-fencing budgets to help farmers reduce their use of mineral fertilisers

    The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) came into force on 1 January 2026. It is a carbon tax applied at the borders of the European Union to imports of certain industrial products covered by the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). Nitrogen-based mineral fertilisers are included in this initial list of products. To avoid an increase in costs for the farmers concerned, the level of the tax has been reduced for fertilisers, and they may even be temporarily excluded from the scope of the CBAM. Yet, for the climate, but also for France’s strategic independence and food sovereignty, the CBAM will ultimately have to be fully applied to mineral fertilisers. To limit or even avoid an increase in farmers’ fertiliser expenditure, we need public policies – some of which are currently under threat. Ring-fencing budgets for these policies would be a way to support farmers’ incomes and the food sovereignty of both the European Union and France, while reducing the carbon footprint of our food system. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer