Events

The contribution of research-action Clubs for agriculture and forestery sectors : economic expertise and innovation for climate

  • Date: 10th December, 3.45pm – 6.45pm
  • Location: The Rio Conventions Pavilion in the Climate Generations Area
  • Organizer : I4CE

 

Summary:

The conference presented the work and progress of the Carbon Forest and Wood Club and the Climate Agriculture Club. The main objective was to present the issues linked to carbon certification in Europe in those sectors, and to highlight the different pilot carbon initiatives carried out by the club members.

 

The conference was divided in three complementary subjects :

1. Forestry/agriculture and climate: the research clubs expertise: what role do the clubs play and what expertise from the members?

Those research clubs gather research institutes , policy makers (local authorities , public Administrations), and professionals from agriculture and forestry sectors, with the goal to provide knowledge on the economic and technical means to improve climate change mitigation within those sectors and make them more resilient to climate change.

 

2. Carbon certification in Europe:

This panel presented the different obstacles to mitigation projects development and both presented solutions and perspectives considered in France and provided examples of mechanisms already implemented in other European countries (UK, Italy … ).

 

The VOCAL project , resulting from the Clubs’work, and aiming at the creation of a national carbon certification framework in France for agriculture and forestry, has been announced.

 

3. Carbon projects development in France:

Despite the lack of certification framework in France, numerous mitigation projects have been implemented by Club members. They are innovative initiatives which reflect the commitment of stakeholders to engage in this path, even before the creation of an appropriate certification framework.

 

The French Ministry for Ecology concluded with its support to carbon project development in France and its participation in the creation of the national framework.

 

A few conclusive remarks:

The work of the Clubs and the members’ expertise allowed everyone to share knowledge, experience and expertise, which resulted in the following observations:

  • Different obstacles to carbon project certification exist in France, and more generally in Europe.
  • However, we observe a growing demand from companies to relocate their offsetting in their own country.
  • Other European countries have already implemented mechanisms which allow the development of domestic mitigation projects.
  • Pilot initiatives to develop carbon projects in agriculture and forestry sectors have emerged in France, despite the current lack of certification framework.

 

Those different observations led I4CE and some club members to launch a project to create a national carbon certification framework for agriculture and forestry sectors, approved by the French Ministry for Ecology. This project is going to be main focus for 2016 and 2017 and should allow carbon certification in France within a few years.

 

Agenda

15h45 – 16h30 : Introduction by Benoit Leguet

 

Table ronde 1 : Les « clubs de recherche-action », KESAKO ?

  • Claudine FOUCHEROT – I4CE Faciliter l’échange entre décideurs publics, recherche académique et acteurs opérationnels
  • Philippe TOUCHAIS – APCA Témoignage d’un membre fondateur du Club Climat Agriculture : le rôle des chambres agricoles dans la lutte contre le changement climatique
  • Marianne RUBIO – ONF Témoignage d’un membre fondateur du Club Carbone Forêt-Bois : la prise en compte des enjeux climatiques par l’ONF

 

16h30 – 17h30 – Table ronde 2 : L’enjeu de la certification carbone en Europe

  • Julia GRIMAULT – I4CE Les freins au développement de projets en Europe et la création d’un référentiel national de certification carbone.
  • Lucio BROTTO – ETIFOR Italian initiative : Italian Forest Carbon Code
  • Pat SNOWDON – Forestry Commission United Kingdom initiative : Woodland Carbon Code

 

17h30 – 18h30  – Table-ronde 3 : Le développement de projets carbone en France et l’appropriation par les acteurs locaux

  • Jean-Baptiste DOLLE – IDELE / Thierry GESLAIN – CNIEL Les filières bovines engagées dans la lutte contre le réchauffement climatique
  • Pierre COMPERE – InVivo AgroSolutions L’insertion de légumineuses dans les rotations pour réduire la fertilisation azotée
  • Alexander MURILLO – ECOACT Evaluer et optimiser le bilan carbone des forêts de Groupama
  • Caroline MARIE – GIP Massif Central, Olivier PICARD – CNPF, Odeline JACOB – Aquitaine Carbone Développement de projets carbone de gestion forestière améliorée en France : exemples du Rhône-Alpes, du Massif Central et de l’Aquitaine

 

18h30 – 18h45 : Conclusion by Alexia LESEUR (I4CE) and Joseph Lunet (DGEC-MEDDE)

10 Dec 2015

The contribution of research-action Clubs for agriculture and forestery sectors : economic expertise and innovation for climate

To learn more
  • 11/28/2025 Foreword of the week
    COP30: The missed turn to implementation – and the coalitions moving ahead anyway

    COP30 concluded with an agreement, proving that multilateralism is still alive. However, the results are underwhelming: no push to transition away from fossil fuels, no decision on deforestation, and mixed outcomes on adaptation metrics.  On climate finance, Belém failed to shift from ambition to implementation. Negotiations quickly drifted back to a battle on yet another high-level quantitative target. The decision to triple adaptation funding by 2035 disappointed many, with its distant time horizon, lack of baseline and non-binding wording. COP30 also missed the opportunity to engage with – and build consensus around – concrete measures outlined in the Baku to Belém roadmap to get to $1.3 trillion. Instead, it defaulted to launching new processes – a work programme on climate finance and a ministerial roundtable on the NCQG.  

  • 11/21/2025 Foreword of the week
    How to strengthen climate risk management and supervision to protect financial stability

    Climate change does not conform to business, political or supervisory regime cycles– its adverse long-term impacts lie beyond such horizons. Ten years ago, when Mark Carney highlighted this paradox in his landmark Tragedy of the Horizons speech, climate change was not considered a financial stability risk. Today, European supervisory stress tests estimate up to €638 billion in banking losses over 8 years, while the European Central Bank (ECB) reveals that over 90% of eurozone banks face climate and environmental risks. A key question arises: Is the supervisors’ primary focus on greening the financial system sufficient in the face of rising risks, especially stranded assets? 

  • 11/13/2025
    How solidarity levies can help bridge the climate and development finance gap

    The climate and development finance gap is large and widening, as Official Development Assistance (ODA) declines and needs multiply. With shrinking fiscal space in vulnerable countries, solidarity levies are gaining attention as a predictable source of international finance. Launched at COP28 by Barbados, France, and Kenya, the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force (GSLTF) is the main initiative in this space.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer