Bridging the Finance Gap: Leveraging National and Subnational Public Financial Institutions for Localised Climate and Development Action

12 November 2025 - Climate Brief - By : Luis ZAMARIOLI SANTOS / Sarah BENDAHOU / Monica MATA ORTEGA / Guilherme LIMA

National Public Banks (NPBs) and Subnational Public Financial Institutions (SPFIs), including development banks and agencies as well as climate and green funds at the subnational level, play an increasingly vital role in financing climate action and the just transition. While national governments provide frameworks aligned with nationally determined contributions (NDCs), actual implementation occurs largely at the subnational level, which currently lacks sufficient funding. SPFIs can work as financial intermediaries, as they not only understand local needs and have stronger ties with local governments and businesses, but also access much larger volumes of capital from more diverse sources. 

 

A key challenge in funding climate projects is project ticket size, as large investors prefer bigger deals to mitigate risks and maximise returns. A Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) survey shows that major private and development impact investors have been channelling more capital into fewer but larger transactions (GIIN, 2024). This trade-off between economies of scale and local needs affects funders like the Green Climate Fund and Multilateral Development Banks, which increasingly strengthen a programme funding approach rather than single-project funding.

 

National and subnational financial intermediaries can bridge this gap by enhancing the bankability of local projects to meet new volume and additionality financial requirements. They can also advance local capacity to address finance and climate issues, development impact, and safeguards, provide tailored guidance, concessionality allocation based on a more holistic and climate-resilient approach, pilot scalable solutions, and innovative financial mechanisms to reduce risks.

 

There are a wide range of examples, from the Cajas Municipales in Peru to state-owned and managed development banks and agencies in Brazil, including São Paulo’s novel climate fund to the longer-established Deposit and Investment Fund of Quebec and Baden-Württemberg’s bank in Germany. Building on current analysis and understanding of best practice, this Policy Brief will explore how subnational financial intermediaries can continue to channel investments to climate and development goals and otherwise less bankable projects. For instance, by leveraging guarantees and enabling blended and sustainable finance mechanisms, thereby expanding access to finance in critical areas from innovation to climate resilience and adaptation.

 

More information about the T20 South Africa 2025

Bridging the Finance Gap: Leveraging National and Subnational Public Financial Institutions for Localised Climate and Development Action Download
I4CE Contacts
Sarah BENDAHOU
Sarah BENDAHOU
Research Fellow – Development finance Email
To learn more
  • 12/11/2025 Blog post
    Climate finance at COP30: Progress, pitfalls, persistent challenges and the path ahead

    A few weeks ago, COP30 concluded in Belém with all parties agreeing on a “global mobilization” (or mutirão) against climate change, proving that multilateralism remains a viable path for action, despite strong geopolitical and economic headwinds. However, Belém delivered underwhelming results: no roadmap to transition away from fossil fuels –despite a powerful push from President Lula, rallying over 80 countries, a lack of concrete decisions on deforestation –disappointing for an “Amazon COP”, and mixed results on the global goal on adaptation, among other outcomes.  

  • 11/28/2025 Foreword of the week
    COP30: The missed turn to implementation – and the coalitions moving ahead anyway

    COP30 concluded with an agreement, proving that multilateralism is still alive. However, the results are underwhelming: no push to transition away from fossil fuels, no decision on deforestation, and mixed outcomes on adaptation metrics.  On climate finance, Belém failed to shift from ambition to implementation. Negotiations quickly drifted back to a battle on yet another high-level quantitative target. The decision to triple adaptation funding by 2035 disappointed many, with its distant time horizon, lack of baseline and non-binding wording. COP30 also missed the opportunity to engage with – and build consensus around – concrete measures outlined in the Baku to Belém roadmap to get to $1.3 trillion. Instead, it defaulted to launching new processes – a work programme on climate finance and a ministerial roundtable on the NCQG.  

  • 11/13/2025
    How solidarity levies can help bridge the climate and development finance gap

    The climate and development finance gap is large and widening, as Official Development Assistance (ODA) declines and needs multiply. With shrinking fiscal space in vulnerable countries, solidarity levies are gaining attention as a predictable source of international finance. Launched at COP28 by Barbados, France, and Kenya, the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force (GSLTF) is the main initiative in this space.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer