Publications Agriculture and food

Does more sustainable food increase consumer budgets?

14 October 2021 - Climate Brief - By : Lucile ROGISSART / Valentin BELLASSEN / Claudine FOUCHEROT

Consuming less animal products and wasting less lighten the budget, but increasing consumption of organic products adds to it. In total, does adopting a sustainable diet increase or decrease consumer spending?

 

Report available in French only

 

While some studies give a clear-cut answer to this question, it actually varies according to at least three factors:

  • The ambition of the sustainable diet: the level of substitution between animal and plant proteins, the share of sustainably produced products (which is simplified to organic), and the level of waste reduction;
  • The economic conditions, in particular the price of organic products compared to conventional products;
  • The initial base of consumers and the prices at which they buy their products, which are strongly correlated with income.

 

I4CE has developed a calculator to measure the effects of each of these factors on the household food budget. Depending on the level of these parameters, the transition to a more sustainable diet can range from a 30% gain to an additional 67% of the consumer’s initial food budget. People with the lowest incomes have the highest potential additional costs.

 

At current prices, regardless of reductions in animal products and waste, consuming mostly organic food is more expensive, especially for the poorest households. The price premium for organic over conventional would have to fall from 65% today to 10% for all households to be able to adopt a less meaty 100% organic diet without increasing their budget.

 

If a high consumption of organic products is targeted, public policies must therefore manage the tension between remunerative prices for sustainable farming practices and an increase in food expenditure acceptable to households.

Click on this button to see the graphic

Does more sustainable food increase consumer budgets? Download
I4CE Contacts
Lucile ROGISSART
Lucile ROGISSART
Project Manager – Agriculture and food and Public finance Email
Claudine FOUCHEROT
Claudine FOUCHEROT
Program Director – Agriculture and Forestry Email
To learn more
  • 01/13/2023 Foreword of the week
    2023 agenda: there has never been a better time to act

    2022 was an eventful year in terms of climate. The year saw the emergence of a new concept, that of the polycrisis: war in Ukraine, the aftereffects of Covid, the return of inflation, the gas crisis, agricultural shortages, persistent droughts and other dramatic climatic events… all of these crises have ultimately pointed to our direct or indirect dependence on fossil fuels; our weaknesses when faced with a changing climate; and the vulnerability of our economies and the middle and lower classes.

  • 12/02/2022 Foreword of the week
    European Carbon Certification must be demanding… and appealing

    How can we differentiate between projects that really enable carbon to be stored and those that only claim to do so? This is a complicated question when dealing with projects in agriculture and forestry, where quantifying carbon storage is complex, and where other environmental challenges, like the preservation of biodiversity, must also be taken into account. A complicated question, therefore, but one that needs an answer! Private actors and public authorities want to ensure that the agricultural and forestry projects financed in the name of the climate have a real environmental benefit.

  • 12/01/2022 Blog post
    Carbon certification: the Commission publishes a stringent certification framework that should also be and appealing

    Yesterday, 30 november 2022, the European Commission adopted a proposal for a first EU-wide voluntary framework to reliably certify high-quality carbon removals. This proposal provides a framework, broad guiding principles, and the details will be specified in 2023 supported by an expert group on Carbon Removals. “The devil may be in the detail”, but the framing is no less important. Claudine Foucherot of [i4ce] has analysed it and identified four points on which we must be vigilant. Overall, it can be said that the Commission is submitting an ambitious proposal, which nevertheless presents a risk: not being sufficient incentives to ensure a massive deployment of certified projects.    

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer