Publications Agriculture and food

Reducing meat consumption: public policies a long way from sustainability objectives

21 February 2023 - Climate Report - By : Lucile ROGISSART

Livestock population in France has been falling for several decades (-20% for dairy cattle and -33% for sows since 2000), without necessarily reducing the quantities produced. But productivity gains will not be able to maintain production levels forever (see “Livestock farming transition: managing past investments and rethinking future ones“). For the decline in livestock farming to have an impact on the climate, it must be accompanied by a drop in meat consumption, but is this really happening?


Report only available in French


In France, total meat consumption is on the rise. It rose from 3.8 to 5.8 million tons of carcass equivalent between 1970 and 2021 (+50%). The increase in total meat consumption is driven by population growth, despite a fall in individual consumption that did occur between 1990 and 2013 (-11%). However, average meat consumption per person is now stagnating or even rising again, implying an increase in imports with no gain for the climate. 


Beyond quantities, the nature of the meat consumed has changed significantly, with i) much more poultry and slightly less beef; ii) more restaurant consumption and iii) more processed meat or meat in processed dishes (nuggets, cordon bleu, pizzas, etc.). 


Click here to see “the Evolution of total and individual quantities of meat available for consumption in France since 1970, broken down by animal type” in French


While this report deals primarily with meat consumption, it also attempts to approach the dynamics of dairy product consumption, despite numerous methodological difficulties. According to our calculations, while dairy consumption has been declining since 1990, it also appears to have stabilized since around 2015. More precise data would nevertheless be required to be sure of this trend. As with meat, a transformation is taking place beyond total volumes: less consumption of milk and fresh products (yoghurt, cream, butter) but continued consumption of cheese. 


At current rates, none of the sustainable meat consumption targets are likely to be met by 2050. All carbon-neutral scenarios count on a reduction in meat consumption, but at varying amplitudes ranging from -20% for the French National Low Carbon Strategy (SNBC), to -70% for ADEME’s scenario 1 by 2050. Without new, more ambitious public policies on the evolution of meat consumption, none of these objectives is likely to be achieved.


It is therefore essential to propose new public policies to change the trend. 


Even before discussing the public policies to be implemented, the first thing to do is to tighten up and specify the total meat reduction target – and not just for beef. For one thing, the SNBC’s target for total meat consumption is the least ambitious of all the sustainability scenarios, and for another, the achievement of this target is backed by a single indicator for beef consumption. While this indicator is necessary, it is not sufficient: a fall in beef consumption cannot be offset by an increase in pork and poultry consumption, for a range of environmental and health reasons.


The public policies implemented or in the process of being implemented in France will very probably not be sufficient. Vegetarian menus in public catering have a limited direct effect (less than 5% of meals consumed), and their educational effects will only be felt over a long period of time. As for the revision of nutritional recommendations or the future introduction of environmental labelling, these are once again policies with an uncertain, long-term effect.


New leads of public policy and private-sector involvement must therefore be explored to bring meat consumption into line with the challenges of sustainability and the evolution of national production volumes. We have identified three main avenues: changing the food offer (in catering and distribution), changing social representations (via advertising, school and TV programs, etc.) and changing taxation and regulations (via a reform of VAT on food products, for example). Acting on these levers in a coordinated and fair manner is a real challenge, but one that must be met. 


With the support of:  

Reducing meat consumption: public policies a long way from sustainability objectives Download
I4CE Contacts
Research Fellow – Financing the agricultural transition, Food systems Email
To learn more
  • 03/15/2024 Foreword of the week
    Certification framework: the devil is in the details

    A few days after the conclusion of negotiations on the European Union’s carbon removals certification Framework (CRCF), I4CE helped organise the European Carbon Farming Summit in Valencia, as part of the CREDIBLE project. The high level of stakeholder participation at the summit testifies to the expectations that this new tool will contribute to a better economic valuation of carbon farming practices. The summit raised high hopes for improving and harmonising carbon measurement to certify projects, in particular through remote sensing, in a sector where there is a great deal of uncertainty. While it is vital to improve measurement and monitoring, uncertainty must not be allowed to justify inaction, and the key is to find the right balance between cost and accuracy.

  • 02/21/2023
    Livestock farming transition: managing past investments and rethinking future ones

    Accompanying the decline in livestock numbers. All transition scenarios rely on a decline in livestock numbers to meet climate targets. Yet in France, most livestock populations are already declining. The challenge is not only to continue this trend, but also to support it, to ensure a fair and acceptable transition for livestock farmers and other players in the livestock industry. This is particularly true for the dairy sector.

  • 12/02/2022 Foreword of the week
    European Carbon Certification must be demanding… and appealing

    How can we differentiate between projects that really enable carbon to be stored and those that only claim to do so? This is a complicated question when dealing with projects in agriculture and forestry, where quantifying carbon storage is complex, and where other environmental challenges, like the preservation of biodiversity, must also be taken into account. A complicated question, therefore, but one that needs an answer! Private actors and public authorities want to ensure that the agricultural and forestry projects financed in the name of the climate have a real environmental benefit.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !