Menu
FR
search
Publications

Recalibrating the EU ETS: in search of a long term price signal to drive investments

18 December 2015 - Carbon Trends

By Matthieu Jalard and Emilie Alberola

With the endorsement of energy and climate targets by the EU Council in October 2014, the proposal for a revised EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) directive disclosed in July and the enforcement of the Market Stability Reserve (MSR) in September2015, a recalibrated EU ETS is emerging for the 2020 to 2030 period. While the debate will be unfolding in 2016 around the final EU ETS directive, the question arises whether the EU ETS will be able to convey a long term price signal to 2030 which could drive investments and innovations, beyond beyond merely impacting short term operational decisions.

Based on our detailed analysis, three main lessons from the first half of the Energy and Climate framework, from 2008 to 2014 have to be considered for designing the Phase IV of the EU ETS.

  • The 2020 EU ETS emissions reduction target has already been overachieved, but the instrument seems to have played a limited role.
  • In the context of an inflexible supply, a large surplus has been building-up, amounting to 2.1 billion allowances in 2014.
  • Without a long-term confidence in the scheme, the surplus has undermined the cost-effectiveness of the EU ETS.

Going forward, achieving a cost-effective decarbonisation of EU ETS sectors requires the carbon price pathway to reflect the abatement cost of the necessary low carbon technologies in the long run. In addition, given the wide uncertainties and barriers to mobilize all abatement potential, complementary mechanisms will remain a key support to drive low carbon and capital intensive investments in the power sector. However, these energy and climate complementary policies should be better coordinated with the EU ETS.

The introduction of the MSR will help absorb this surplus by mid-2020, and increase resillience to external shocks spurred by economic circonstances and complementary policies.  However, without an appropriate governance of the MSR and more broadly the EU ETS, the uncertainties concerning the long term carbon price development will remain too high to drive investments, further encouraging fragmented schemes for their necessary promotion. In the end, the decarbonisation cost could increase for European citizens.

“Exploring the EU ETS beyond 2020: a first assessment of the EU Commission’s proposal for Phase IV of the EU ETS (2021-2030), November 2015

Recalibrating the EU ETS: in search of a long term price signal to drive investments Download
To learn more
  • 12/12/2025 Blog post Foreword of the week
    Paris +10: France and Europe must step up on climate – to protect our security, sovereignty, competitiveness, and public finances

    How distant December 12, 2015 now seems. All delegations at COP21 had then rallied behind Laurent Fabius’s little green hammer. Ten years later, the trend is closer to backlash. Climate action is now often portrayed in the public debate as too costly, because it requires major investment. Ineffective, since our share of global emissions is small. Unfair, because it cuts into purchasing power. Too divisive, supported only by part of the electorate. Too late, since keeping the planet below +2°C of warming now seems out of reach. Arguments that are partly true—yet require substantial nuance. 

  • 12/11/2025 Blog post
    Climate finance at COP30: Progress, pitfalls, persistent challenges and the path ahead

    A few weeks ago, COP30 concluded in Belém with all parties agreeing on a “global mobilization” (or mutirão) against climate change, proving that multilateralism remains a viable path for action, despite strong geopolitical and economic headwinds. However, Belém delivered underwhelming results: no roadmap to transition away from fossil fuels –despite a powerful push from President Lula, rallying over 80 countries, a lack of concrete decisions on deforestation –disappointing for an “Amazon COP”, and mixed results on the global goal on adaptation, among other outcomes.  

  • 12/05/2025 Foreword of the week
    Maintaining the 2035 target: Ensuring a viable future for Europe’s automotive industry

    In the run up to the publication of the European Commission’s proposals for an automotive package on 10 December, car manufactures have stepped up the calls to relax the CO2 standards and the 2035 phase-out of new combustion-engine vehicles by including some flexibilities. They highlight the challenges the industry has faced in recent years, growing competitive pressure from China, and insufficient demand for electric vehicles in Europe as reasons for the sector needing more time for the transition required to meet the targets.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer