Events

Around the world in carbon markets: Emissions Trading Case Studies

  • Date: 1st December, 1.15pm – 2.15pm
  • Location: IETA Pavilion, Business Hub Room Paris
  • Partner(s):  IETA and Environmental Defense Fund

 

The event discussed carbon market experiences and challenges in Europe, North America and emerging countries based on a series of case studies published by IETA, EDF and I4CE in 2015.

 

Key messages:

  • Benoit Leguet, Managing Director, I4CE: Since 2014, the EU ETS has been successful in over achieving its 2020 emission reduction target and complementary policies have played a significant role in reducing emissions. The next step will be to recalibrate the scheme with the Market Stability Reserve, a new adjustment mechanism, voted in 2015 and to endorse EU ETS 2030 ambition based on the -43% target compared to 2005. View Benoit’s presentation.
  • Derek Walker, Associate Vice President, EDF:  In California; although GDP has increased by 4-5 % since the implementation of the cap-and-trade program. CO2 emissions among covered entities have reduced by 2% proving that economic growth can be decoupled from emissions growth.
  • Jeff Swartz, Director International Policy, IETA: Chinese ETS pilots and the future national ETS (2017) may encourage the emergence of more carbon pricing initiatives by reducing regional competitiveness concerns. However before this, it is imperative that the right MRV framework is implemented to ensure reliability and effectiveness. View Jeff’s presentation.
  • Vikram Widge, Head of Climate Finance and Policy, World Bank Group: Carbon pricing initiatives are essential and ETS is an effective way to achieve a GHG emission reduction goal. A plug-and-play market based mechanism can help countries take measurable actions that are recognized internationally. View Vikram’s presentation.

 

Found more information about our carbon pricing policy case studies

01 Dec 2015

Around the world in carbon markets: Emissions Trading Case Studies

To learn more
  • 01/21/2026 Blog post
    On Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming the devil is in…the demand

    The implementation of carbon farming practices on European farms and in European forests is a lever for achieving carbon neutrality, but also for farm resilience, the adaptation of forest stands to climate change and for contributing to our strategic independence. Certifying and financing low-carbon practices is the objective of the CRCF (Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming) regulation, which will come into effect in 2026. Now seems the right time to draw lessons from six years of experience with a similar standard in France: the “Label Bas-Carbone” (Low Carbon Label – LBC). The results show that striking a balance between scientific rigour and accessibility for stakeholders has led to the development of a substantial range of projects. However, the real challenge is to build sufficient and appropriate demand to finance the projects. There is no miracle solution, but complementary financing channels may emerge. 

  • 01/16/2026 Foreword of the week
    2026: An electric atmosphere

    The year ahead promises to be electric. In a highly unpredictable geopolitical context, the European Union must balance its commitment to the long-term goals of climate neutrality and the immediate attention to security and competitiveness concerns. This puts electrification high on the agenda in Brussels. First, the Grids Package, presented in December 2025, provides for a more centralised approach to planning and is expected to be adopted by the Council in June. Second, before the summer, the Commission intends to present an Electrification Action Plan, which will focus on lowering prices and reinforcing demand. 

  • 12/12/2025 Blog post Foreword of the week
    Paris +10: France and Europe must step up on climate – to protect our security, sovereignty, competitiveness, and public finances

    How distant December 12, 2015 now seems. All delegations at COP21 had then rallied behind Laurent Fabius’s little green hammer. Ten years later, the trend is closer to backlash. Climate action is now often portrayed in the public debate as too costly, because it requires major investment. Ineffective, since our share of global emissions is small. Unfair, because it cuts into purchasing power. Too divisive, supported only by part of the electorate. Too late, since keeping the planet below +2°C of warming now seems out of reach. Arguments that are partly true—yet require substantial nuance. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer