Publications

How could financial actors manage their exposure to climate risks?

4 May 2017 - Climate Brief - By : Morgane NICOL / Ian COCHRAN, Phd

Financial actors should integrate a forward-looking climate assessment into their procedures and models

In order to manage climate-related issues in their portfolios, financial actors will need in the long run to incorporate a forward-looking analysis for alignment of their portfolios with a 2°C pathway into their risk management and investment decision-making processes. Such analysis would need to be based on scenarios that represent different pathways for decarbonisation of the economy, and more specifically a 2°C pathway, broken down into quantitative variables of financial impact of the risks and opportunity for low-carbon transition.

A number of constraints currently limit their ability to conduct such an assessment

However, certain constraints currently restrict the possibility for financial institutions to carry out such analysis for all of their outstanding investment and financing amounts: the lack of forward-looking information on companies and other counterparties; certain current features of financial models; the lack of breakdown of climate-related scenarios into financial impact variables; the information systems of financial players which need to be adapted; and the lack of training on climate-related issues for their personnel.

However, financial actors should begin today to implement initial actions

Nonetheless, financial players can start as of today to progressively roll out a certain number of preliminary actions:

  • Encouraging their counterparties to issue forward-looking information on their own alignment with a 2°C pathway, for example by following initial TCFD guidelines;
  • Adopting an internal stance on scenarios on which analyses are to be based, in particular “2°C” scenarios, and thinking about the objectives to be set for each business sector;
  • Adapting information systems so as to be able to collect, store and aggregate new indicators and information on the climate-related issues of counterparties;
  • Adapting the financial models used;
  • Training all employees on the impacts of climate-related issues for the financial sector;
  • Collecting and analysing the climate-related indicators already available, as detailed in Climate Brief no. 46;
  • Putting in place a governance system that will encourage climate-related issues to be taken into consideration by each internal business division.
How could financial actors manage their exposure to climate risks? Download
To learn more
  • 11/28/2025 Foreword of the week
    COP30: The missed turn to implementation – and the coalitions moving ahead anyway

    COP30 concluded with an agreement, proving that multilateralism is still alive. However, the results are underwhelming: no push to transition away from fossil fuels, no decision on deforestation, and mixed outcomes on adaptation metrics.  On climate finance, Belém failed to shift from ambition to implementation. Negotiations quickly drifted back to a battle on yet another high-level quantitative target. The decision to triple adaptation funding by 2035 disappointed many, with its distant time horizon, lack of baseline and non-binding wording. COP30 also missed the opportunity to engage with – and build consensus around – concrete measures outlined in the Baku to Belém roadmap to get to $1.3 trillion. Instead, it defaulted to launching new processes – a work programme on climate finance and a ministerial roundtable on the NCQG.  

  • 11/21/2025 Foreword of the week
    How to strengthen climate risk management and supervision to protect financial stability

    Climate change does not conform to business, political or supervisory regime cycles– its adverse long-term impacts lie beyond such horizons. Ten years ago, when Mark Carney highlighted this paradox in his landmark Tragedy of the Horizons speech, climate change was not considered a financial stability risk. Today, European supervisory stress tests estimate up to €638 billion in banking losses over 8 years, while the European Central Bank (ECB) reveals that over 90% of eurozone banks face climate and environmental risks. A key question arises: Is the supervisors’ primary focus on greening the financial system sufficient in the face of rising risks, especially stranded assets? 

  • 11/13/2025
    How solidarity levies can help bridge the climate and development finance gap

    The climate and development finance gap is large and widening, as Official Development Assistance (ODA) declines and needs multiply. With shrinking fiscal space in vulnerable countries, solidarity levies are gaining attention as a predictable source of international finance. Launched at COP28 by Barbados, France, and Kenya, the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force (GSLTF) is the main initiative in this space.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer