Heat wave, stop being surprised, let’s invest better

27 June 2019 - Blog post - By : Vivian DEPOUES, PhD

June 2019, the heat wave that affects France and part of Europe takes centre stage. However, we should be less and less surprised by this type of weather event which, with climate change, is becoming more and more common. To see this, take a look at the ClimatHD portal put online by Météo France to disseminate the main climate projections in France. Trends have already been observed and if we continue on the same greenhouse gas emission trajectory, a heat wave as extreme in intensity but also in duration as the 2003 France heat wave (which remains the reference extreme) will be a normal summer in the second half of the century. Such events have health but also economic consequences amounting to billions of euros, with effects on labour productivity, agricultural production and the energy sector.

 

Météofrance projections

 

 

We can then ask ourselves what will be the future extreme events, those that may legitimately surprise us tomorrow. For example, some scientific studies point to new records with temperatures exceeding 50°C in several regions of France.  Above all, however, we must ask ourselves what it means for cities, territories and economic activities to experience heat waves such as the one we are experiencing this summer 2019 on a much more regular basis. Some communities and organizations have taken full ownership of this issue. In France, Lyon or Paris are among the good students very often mentioned. However, despite the existence of a National Climate Change Adaptation Plan and the obligation for intermunicipalities to integrate adaptation into their Territorial Air Energy Climate Plans, these examples remain the exception rather than the rule. Far too many actors still think that we will adapt as we go along.

 

This is where low-will, without anticipation, there is a good chance that spontaneous behaviour is not the best answer. If we wait until the next weather alert to prepare, the risk of making sub-optimal decisions is high. Just look at the last-minute purchases of air conditioners that mark the beginning of each episode. Such individual, short-term measures are only slightly effective and generate unwanted consequences (we talk about “missadaptation”) such as very high over-consumption of energy.

 

Not anticipating sufficiently, it is like stopping in losing trajectories in a different climate.

 

 

More systemic responses require more time: to adapt urban planning, green streets, de-waterproofing soils, design sustainable cooling systems, develop cool public spaces, create shade, etc. The challenge is then to integrate these considerations into the planning processes but also into the organization of a number of essential essentiels : to manage water resources properly, to be able to count on well dimensioned sanitary services, possibly to reorganize working hours and travel needs, etc. While some activities can afford to adapt their decisions in a relatively agile way, others can only change over much longer periods of time. Some developments or reconversions require long-term investments (e. g. in new infrastructure or equipment), R&D, new skills and incompressible learning times. Not anticipating sufficiently means stopping in losing trajectories in a different climate. We cannot ignore the fact that adaptation would be to the detriment of certain particularly vulnerable actors.

 

Preparing for this radically new situation in which the summers we are about to experience do not resemble the summers of the past must be a strategic objective. It is necessary to systematically ask the question of how this new situation can be taken into account in all the development choices that are made: development decisions, the development of structuring economic sectors, investment in new equipment or new skills. The challenge is to ensure that collectively we invest in cities and territories that continue to be enjoyable for all. The contribution to resilience to a changing climate must become a central performance criterion for urban, economic development and social policies

 

In 2019-2020, I4CE will study the role that public financial institutions can play in adapting French territories to this type of event.

I4CE Contacts
Vivian DEPOUES, PhD
Vivian DEPOUES, PhD
Research Lead – Adaptation to climate change Email
To learn more
  • 11/28/2025 Foreword of the week
    COP30: The missed turn to implementation – and the coalitions moving ahead anyway

    COP30 concluded with an agreement, proving that multilateralism is still alive. However, the results are underwhelming: no push to transition away from fossil fuels, no decision on deforestation, and mixed outcomes on adaptation metrics.  On climate finance, Belém failed to shift from ambition to implementation. Negotiations quickly drifted back to a battle on yet another high-level quantitative target. The decision to triple adaptation funding by 2035 disappointed many, with its distant time horizon, lack of baseline and non-binding wording. COP30 also missed the opportunity to engage with – and build consensus around – concrete measures outlined in the Baku to Belém roadmap to get to $1.3 trillion. Instead, it defaulted to launching new processes – a work programme on climate finance and a ministerial roundtable on the NCQG.  

  • 11/13/2025
    How solidarity levies can help bridge the climate and development finance gap

    The climate and development finance gap is large and widening, as Official Development Assistance (ODA) declines and needs multiply. With shrinking fiscal space in vulnerable countries, solidarity levies are gaining attention as a predictable source of international finance. Launched at COP28 by Barbados, France, and Kenya, the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force (GSLTF) is the main initiative in this space.

  • 11/12/2025
    Bridging the Finance Gap: Leveraging National and Subnational Public Financial Institutions for Localised Climate and Development Action

    National Public Banks (NPBs) and Subnational Public Financial Institutions (SPFIs), including development banks and agencies as well as climate and green funds at the subnational level, play an increasingly vital role in financing climate action and the just transition. While national governments provide frameworks aligned with nationally determined contributions (NDCs), actual implementation occurs largely at the subnational level, which currently lacks sufficient funding. SPFIs can work as financial intermediaries, as they not only understand local needs and have stronger ties with local governments and businesses, but also access much larger volumes of capital from more diverse sources. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer