Publications

What incentives to climate change mitigation through harvested wood products in the current french policy framework? (Summary)

15 September 2014 - Climate Report

Beyond the important role that forests play in the fight against climate change through the sequestration of carbon in their biomass, wood products also contribute to climate change through three channels:
- Material substitution : the manufacturing of wood products being less energy intensive allows to avoid carbon emissions from the processing of other alternative materials (eg. concrete, steel, etc);
- Energy substitution: achieved by the generation of energy from wood combustion replacing other fossil fuels.
- Carbon sequestration in the wood products: wood products sequester carbon during their whole life span until their decomposition.

This Climate Report identifies French policies that have an impact on climate change mitigation by wood products through these three mitigation channels. Our analysis asserts that similarl to the context at the EU level, the current national policy framework incentives are mostly directed to the “energy wood” sector. These incentives include fiscal and financial instruments such as:
- The heat fund (fonds chaleur), which subsidizes the production of renewable heat particularly from biomass;
- The zero interest rate eco-loans (éco-prêt à taux zéro) and the Sustainable development tax credit (crédit d’impôt développement durable (CIDD)) which partly subsidize wood heating;
- Reduced VAT on renewable heat purchases.

The use of wood as a material is currently less encouraged, at least on the financial side: the few devices that support it are rarely binding and mobilize limited resources.

Future measures planned under the National Action Plan for the forest-based sector and the upcoming law for the future of agriculture and forestry (Loi d’avenir pour l’agriculture et la forêt) could slightly rebalance this situation.

What incentives to climate change mitigation through harvested wood products in the current french policy framework? (Summary) Download
To learn more
  • 12/04/2025 Blog post
    Relaxing EU standards on CO2 emissions won’t save the EU’s automotive industry, or help consumers

    Recently, car manufacturers have been calling for a relaxation of CO2 emission standards for cars and vans and the 2035 phase-out target for new internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, by including some flexibilities. They point in particular to the crisis the industry has faced in recent years, growing competitive pressure from China, and insufficient demand for electric vehicles (EVs) in Europe, as reasons for the sector needing more time for the transition required to meet the targets. As the European Commission (EC) prepares to publish its package for the automotive industry, including a revision of CO₂ standards for cars and vans, this blogpost examines the realities behind the difficulties currently faced by car manufacturers and the consequences of relaxing and postponing the planned EU regulations for this sector. 

  • 12/04/2025 Blog post
    Maintaining the 2035 target to support the transition of the French automobile industry

    With the aim to reduce its CO2 emissions and costly fossil-fuel imports, in 2022 the European Parliament adopted a rule that, from 2035, all new vehicles must be zero-emission, which essentially means that they must be electric. However, this rule is now being questioned, with car manufacturers requesting that it be revised to allow plug-in […]

  • 11/28/2025 Foreword of the week
    COP30: The missed turn to implementation – and the coalitions moving ahead anyway

    COP30 concluded with an agreement, proving that multilateralism is still alive. However, the results are underwhelming: no push to transition away from fossil fuels, no decision on deforestation, and mixed outcomes on adaptation metrics.  On climate finance, Belém failed to shift from ambition to implementation. Negotiations quickly drifted back to a battle on yet another high-level quantitative target. The decision to triple adaptation funding by 2035 disappointed many, with its distant time horizon, lack of baseline and non-binding wording. COP30 also missed the opportunity to engage with – and build consensus around – concrete measures outlined in the Baku to Belém roadmap to get to $1.3 trillion. Instead, it defaulted to launching new processes – a work programme on climate finance and a ministerial roundtable on the NCQG.  

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer