Public development banks in the spotlight: What we should be looking out for

21 October 2022 - Foreword of the week - By : Claire ESCHALIER

The end of the year is always a busy period for the climate finance world, with international events multiplying to take stock of the latest achievements in the implementation of the Paris agreement and to identify the next – more ambitious – steps to be taken by the international community. Though the climax of these events is undoubtedly the COP (starting in two weeks in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt), with the New York Climate Week, and the World Bank and IMF’s international meetings behind us, and the Finance in Common summit coming to an end, we start sensing that some topics are already drawing a lot of attention.


The role of public development banks (PDBs) is in the spotlight, and rightly so. There has indeed been a lot of recent talk – not always positive – on their exemplarity and their impact on the real economy, most memorably with the World Bank’s President questioning climate science, just a few weeks ago. Yet, we see that they still catalyse much of the international community’s expectations to “make finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low GHG emissions and climate-resilient development” – or in other words to be aligned with the Paris Agreement. It’s no longer just about international financial institutions showing the way to a sustainable transition, it’s also about local public banks, and how they are uniquely positioned to engage with local authorities to push climate issues on top of the agenda.


This year, more than ever, we see public financial institutions joining forces to come up with collective solutions to continue setting the pace for a broader mainstreaming of climate in the economy, despite the setbacks brought in by repeated crises. Two years after jointly committing to “Aligning their activities with the objectives of the Paris Agreement”, Finance in Common members (more than 520 PDBs) have reaffirmed their engagement towards climate action by focusing this year’s event on “accelerating green and just transitions for a sustainable recovery”, in these times of crises.  This ambitious objective will require a change in paradigm – as argued by Sarah Bendahou in her blogpost you can read in this newsletter – to replace the GHG emission reduction prism, by a more comprehensive, real economy impact prism. With several instruments already being explored by frontline PDBs, we should soon be able to draw some lessons, to broaden the outreach of this new, much welcomed approach.  


Shareholders will have a decisive role to play in giving PDBs the means to increase their impact and provide transformational solutions for a low GHG, climate resilient development. Clarified mandates, stronger financial support and revised supervisory requirements are avenues being explored to encourage PDBs to take more risk in favour of impactful climate financing decisions (some of these avenues were detailed in an Independent Review of Multilateral Development Banks’ Capital Adequacy Frameworks published this summer). In fact, ten of the World Bank’s major shareholders have just this week announced their intention of reforming the World Bank’s management to better meet today’s challenges and investment needs. This announcement had been eagerly awaited, not only because of the recent controversy surrounding World Bank’s President’s views on climate change, but mostly because more and more voices have been rising to point out some incoherences between some international financial institutions’ pivotal role in channelling climate finance and their actual engagements (with regards to fossil fuels for instance).


Read more
To learn more
  • 01/18/2023
    The limitations of voluntary climate commitments from private financial actors

    Private finance will not fund the transition without a stronger commitment from public authorities.
    For several years, and particularly since COP 26, considerable time and attention has been dedicated to the subject of voluntary commitments from private financial actors. These commitments, made within the framework of international initiatives, should in principle enable private finance to be mobilized for the transition to a carbon neutral economy.

  • 11/25/2022 Foreword of the week
    Financial regulators must stenghen their game

    One year ago the creation of the Glasgow Finance Alliance for Net Zero – GFANZ – was announced. The expectations were as big as the numbers: a coalition gathering 500 financial actors representing 130 trillion dollars. Private financial actors were finally stepping in and mobilizing. But one year later, the coalition raises many doubts. On one side it faces criticism from NGOs, and on the other some US actors are considering leaving the coalition under the pressure of members of Republicans Party.  

  • 11/24/2022
    Implementing prudential transition plans for banks: what are the expexted impacts?

    The European Union has made rapid progress on the issue of transition plans for companies and banks. First of all, the CSRD directive obliges each listed company to publish its plan for achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. Published by EFRAG this summer, the standards set for these plans can be considered ambitious and commensurate with the challenges they face. With regards to banks, it is now clear that they will be required to publish their transition plan. What remains under debate is whether these transition plans should be integrated into prudential regulations, which would open the way to numerous possibilities of action and sanctions by supervisors.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !