Fossil fuel phase-out: Development banks need to play a bigger role

8 March 2024 - Foreword of the week - By : Sarah BENDAHOU

A couple of months ago, COP28 called for the acceleration of efforts “towards the phase-down of unabated coal power”. Limiting temperature rise to 1.5°C requires stopping the construction of new coal power plants, that’s for sure. But it also requires retiring existing plants before the end of their lifetimes, which can be more challenging. Public development banks (PDBs) are well-positioned to help overcome barriers to coal phase-out and support countries with the transition to decarbonised electricity systems. A growing number of these banks are exploring strategies to accelerate the early retirement of coal plants. Yet these efforts may carry risks of unintended adverse impacts.

 

Together with NewClimate Institute, we reviewed the instruments PDBs can use to support the early retirement of coal plants in the Global South. We also looked more closely at the challenges and risks these instruments may pose. We find that to achieve lasting emission reductions, PDBs should first seek firm commitments from partner country governments and other stakeholders to phase out coal and other fossil fuels. These banks can then engage in different ways with policymakers and power producers to support coal phase-out. But no matter the challenge, they should not use scarce public funds for little decarbonisation impact. 

 

PDBs have a significant role to play in supporting a just energy transition across countries, from offering advisory services and technical assistance to different forms of financing. Yet the transition away from coal, with its potential consequences on energy access, local communities’ livelihoods, and the broader social and economic impacts it may have, is just one example of a pressing climate and development issue PDBs need to address. They need to play an even bigger role in achieving development and climate outcomes where needed, as called for by the international community. I4CE will continue to work on how PDBs mainstream climate considerations and transform the way they operate, for them to meaningfully contribute to countries’ low-emissions and climate-resilient development pathways. 

 

Read the newsletter

To learn more
  • 12/11/2025 Blog post
    Climate finance at COP30: Progress, pitfalls, persistent challenges and the path ahead

    A few weeks ago, COP30 concluded in Belém with all parties agreeing on a “global mobilization” (or mutirão) against climate change, proving that multilateralism remains a viable path for action, despite strong geopolitical and economic headwinds. However, Belém delivered underwhelming results: no roadmap to transition away from fossil fuels –despite a powerful push from President Lula, rallying over 80 countries, a lack of concrete decisions on deforestation –disappointing for an “Amazon COP”, and mixed results on the global goal on adaptation, among other outcomes.  

  • 11/28/2025 Foreword of the week
    COP30: The missed turn to implementation – and the coalitions moving ahead anyway

    COP30 concluded with an agreement, proving that multilateralism is still alive. However, the results are underwhelming: no push to transition away from fossil fuels, no decision on deforestation, and mixed outcomes on adaptation metrics.  On climate finance, Belém failed to shift from ambition to implementation. Negotiations quickly drifted back to a battle on yet another high-level quantitative target. The decision to triple adaptation funding by 2035 disappointed many, with its distant time horizon, lack of baseline and non-binding wording. COP30 also missed the opportunity to engage with – and build consensus around – concrete measures outlined in the Baku to Belém roadmap to get to $1.3 trillion. Instead, it defaulted to launching new processes – a work programme on climate finance and a ministerial roundtable on the NCQG.  

  • 11/13/2025
    How solidarity levies can help bridge the climate and development finance gap

    The climate and development finance gap is large and widening, as Official Development Assistance (ODA) declines and needs multiply. With shrinking fiscal space in vulnerable countries, solidarity levies are gaining attention as a predictable source of international finance. Launched at COP28 by Barbados, France, and Kenya, the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force (GSLTF) is the main initiative in this space.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer