Publications

European climate targets: land-use and forestry contributions

22 October 2018 - Climate Brief - By : / Clothilde TRONQUET / Valentin BELLASSEN

Carbon sequestration in biomass and soils is essential to achieve carbon neutrality targets by 2050. It is therefore important that is sector is properly taken into account in countries’ climate objectives.

As of 2020, the land-use, land-use change and forestry sector (LULUCF) will be fully included in the European climate targets for 2030.

Following an almost two years long consultation and negotiation process, the European Council and Parliament adopted on 30 May 2018 the Regulation (UE) 841/2018, laying down the rules to account for greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions and removals from this sector. This regulation reinforces the European Union’s nationally determined contribution (NDC) to the Paris Agreement and could influence how the land

This Climate Point answers two major questions :

1) What is the content of this Regulation that will determine how the contributions of the land sector – and in particular forests – to the European climate targets will be accounted for?

2) What are the different topics of debate and what are the political and technical issues underlying the proposed rules?

The flexibility mechanisms and modalities for taking into account managed forest lands are at the core of the issues at stake in this Regulation, which reflects the ambiguities of the contribution of the forest sector to climate change mitigation.

On the one hand, this sector allows for CO2 removals by maintaining and strengthening carbon sinks, but it also generates emission reductions in other sectors through the use of harvested wood products as a substitute for fossil fuels and more energy-intensive materials.

 

European climate targets: land-use and forestry contributions Download
I4CE Contacts
Clothilde TRONQUET
Clothilde TRONQUET
Chercheuse – Carbon farming, Marchés carbone, Clubs Agriculture et Forêt Email
To learn more
  • 01/21/2026 Blog post
    On Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming the devil is in…the demand

    The implementation of carbon farming practices on European farms and in European forests is a lever for achieving carbon neutrality, but also for farm resilience, the adaptation of forest stands to climate change and for contributing to our strategic independence. Certifying and financing low-carbon practices is the objective of the CRCF (Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming) regulation, which will come into effect in 2026. Now seems the right time to draw lessons from six years of experience with a similar standard in France: the “Label Bas-Carbone” (Low Carbon Label – LBC). The results show that striking a balance between scientific rigour and accessibility for stakeholders has led to the development of a substantial range of projects. However, the real challenge is to build sufficient and appropriate demand to finance the projects. There is no miracle solution, but complementary financing channels may emerge. 

  • 01/16/2026 Foreword of the week
    2026: An electric atmosphere

    The year ahead promises to be electric. In a highly unpredictable geopolitical context, the European Union must balance its commitment to the long-term goals of climate neutrality and the immediate attention to security and competitiveness concerns. This puts electrification high on the agenda in Brussels. First, the Grids Package, presented in December 2025, provides for a more centralised approach to planning and is expected to be adopted by the Council in June. Second, before the summer, the Commission intends to present an Electrification Action Plan, which will focus on lowering prices and reinforcing demand. 

  • 12/12/2025 Blog post Foreword of the week
    Paris +10: France and Europe must step up on climate – to protect our security, sovereignty, competitiveness, and public finances

    How distant December 12, 2015 now seems. All delegations at COP21 had then rallied behind Laurent Fabius’s little green hammer. Ten years later, the trend is closer to backlash. Climate action is now often portrayed in the public debate as too costly, because it requires major investment. Ineffective, since our share of global emissions is small. Unfair, because it cuts into purchasing power. Too divisive, supported only by part of the electorate. Too late, since keeping the planet below +2°C of warming now seems out of reach. Arguments that are partly true—yet require substantial nuance. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer