Green Bonds: what contribution to the Paris Agreement and how to maximize it?

13 December 2017 - Climate Report - By : Morgane NICOL / Ian COCHRAN, Phd

Adopted in 2015 at COP21, the Paris Agreement triggered new momentum in the fight against climate change and confirmed the global target of limiting the rise of global mean temperature to 1.5-2°C compared to the preindustrial period. Among the objectives, the central role finance has to play in order to achieve this transition has been reaffirmed in Article 2.1.(c): “Making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate resilient development”.

Green bonds are increasingly seen as of one of the key ‘green’ financial products aimed at financing assets compatible with a low-carbon and climate resilient economy, referred in this note as ‘lowcarbon climate resilient (LCCR) investments’. On the one hand, market actors are enthusiastic about the rapid growth of this new market – as well as the spotlight it drives on sustainable finance.

However, on the other hand, some observers are concerned about two key challenges for the green bond market. First, the green bond market does not appear to directly stimulate a net increase in green investments, e.g. through a lower cost of capital. Second, the spontaneous bottom-up manner of the development of the green bond market raises reputational and legal risks related to its environmental integrity.

In order to realize its full potential to contribute to the LCCR transition, the green bond market will therefore have to overcome these two challenges.

This report summarizes the principal findings of the research I4CE has conducted to further analyze these two key challenges with the support from the Climate Works Foundation. The two final reports for the program will be published later this year / early 2018.


A short version of this report is available in Spanish online here and in a pdf here.

Green Bonds: what contribution to the Paris Agreement and how to maximize it? Download
I4CE Contacts
Morgane NICOL
Morgane NICOL
Director program – Local authorities, Adaptation, Public finance Email
To learn more
  • 06/09/2023 Foreword of the week
    Green Deal: chapter 2

    Emmanuel Macron certainly made a mistake in calling for a European “regulatory pause” on the environment. In the same speech, he however expressed a truth that is essential to the debate: “Europe and France risk being the best-in-class in terms of regulation, and the worst-in-class in terms of financing”. It went unnoticed but, as highlighted in this I4CE newsletter, the time has come for a debate on how the EU can better finance the climate transition. And there is no time like the present! In precisely one year, on June 9th 2024, hundreds of millions of Europeans will vote for a new European Parliament, that will in term elect a new European Commission that will negotiate the future EU budget.

  • 06/08/2023 Blog post Op-ed
    Climate investment: working with our differences

    How much should France invest in climate action ? Experts from diverse backgrounds have sought to answer this important and seemingly simple question. They agree that France needs to invest more to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. But they differ on the scale of public and private funding needs, which range from €20 to €100 billion a year. Is this a cause for concern? Not really, because the experts are not counting the same thing. These differences can be explained and should not be used as an excuse for inaction.

  • 06/08/2023 Blog post
    Can France finance the transition only with budget savings?

    How does the government plan to finance the increase in its public spending on climate action? Further to the government’s reactions to the Pisani-Ferry report, which proposes using all options, including debt and tax increases, let us make an assumption: what if the government were to rely solely on budget saving options? I4CE’s Damien Demailly reviews the savings options available to the government. Clearly, they are all difficult to implement and some may prove counterproductive. They are nevertheless on the government’s agenda and are worth explaining and discussing, as are all options to finance the transition.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !