Green Bonds: what contribution to the Paris Agreement and how to maximize it?

13 December 2017 - Climate Report - By : Morgane NICOL / Ian COCHRAN, Phd

Adopted in 2015 at COP21, the Paris Agreement triggered new momentum in the fight against climate change and confirmed the global target of limiting the rise of global mean temperature to 1.5-2°C compared to the preindustrial period. Among the objectives, the central role finance has to play in order to achieve this transition has been reaffirmed in Article 2.1.(c): “Making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate resilient development”.

Green bonds are increasingly seen as of one of the key ‘green’ financial products aimed at financing assets compatible with a low-carbon and climate resilient economy, referred in this note as ‘lowcarbon climate resilient (LCCR) investments’. On the one hand, market actors are enthusiastic about the rapid growth of this new market – as well as the spotlight it drives on sustainable finance.

However, on the other hand, some observers are concerned about two key challenges for the green bond market. First, the green bond market does not appear to directly stimulate a net increase in green investments, e.g. through a lower cost of capital. Second, the spontaneous bottom-up manner of the development of the green bond market raises reputational and legal risks related to its environmental integrity.

In order to realize its full potential to contribute to the LCCR transition, the green bond market will therefore have to overcome these two challenges.

This report summarizes the principal findings of the research I4CE has conducted to further analyze these two key challenges with the support from the Climate Works Foundation. The two final reports for the program will be published later this year / early 2018.

 

A short version of this report is available in Spanish online here and in a pdf here.

Green Bonds: what contribution to the Paris Agreement and how to maximize it? Download
I4CE Contacts
Morgane NICOL
Morgane NICOL
Program Director – Territories Email
To learn more
  • 01/16/2023
    Landscape of climate finance in France – 2022 edition

    2022, France is paying dearly for a dependence on fossil fuels maintained by a chronic lack of investment in the decarbonisation of the economy. This edition of the Landscape of climate finance in France makes a detailed analysis of these critical expenditures by households, companies and public authorities, in the retrofitting of buildings, the purchase of electric vehicles, and renewable energies, as well as in rail, cycling and urban public transport infrastructures. Encouragingly, climate investments have increased significantly in the past year, driven, among other factors, by favourable regulations and by state support under the recovery plan. But this growth remains fragile, and analysis of several transition scenarios shows that climate investments need to increase further in order to stay on track to carbon neutrality and to ensure a lasting reduction in France’s dependence on fossil fuels.

  • 01/13/2023 Foreword of the week
    2023 agenda: there has never been a better time to act

    2022 was an eventful year in terms of climate. The year saw the emergence of a new concept, that of the polycrisis: war in Ukraine, the aftereffects of Covid, the return of inflation, the gas crisis, agricultural shortages, persistent droughts and other dramatic climatic events… all of these crises have ultimately pointed to our direct or indirect dependence on fossil fuels; our weaknesses when faced with a changing climate; and the vulnerability of our economies and the middle and lower classes.

  • 11/18/2022 Foreword of the week
    COP27: let us remember the obvious about climate finance

    As COP27 draws to a close, let us remember the obvious: implementing the Paris Agreement will require financial flows from developed to developing countries. However, these flows are not just the much discussed $100 billion a year promised by the nations of the North to their counterparts in the South – a promise that has not been kept to date. And they are not just about budgetary flows either. More fundamentally, the architecture of development financing – or at least its climate component – needs to be reviewed in depth. It is therefore primarily the mission and modus operandi of the multilateral banks, and more broadly of the public development banks, that must be reviewed.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer