Operationalization Framework on Aligning with the Paris Agreement

4 June 2021 - Climate Report - By : Katharina LÜTKEHERMÖLLER / Aki KACHI (NewClimate Institute) / Alice PAUTHIER / Ian COCHRAN, Phd

In 2017, the International Development Finance Club (IDFC) together with the group of Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) made a joint commitment to “align financial flows with the Paris Agreement”. Since its commitment, the IDFC had focused its efforts on identifying what alignment means and implies. In 2018, the IDFC commissioned a study by I4CE and the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) to establish a theoretical and conceptual basis for alignment and what internal changes it implies. Moving a step further, the IDFC mandated NewClimate Institute and I4CE to develop an operationalization framework on Aligning with the Paris Agreement. Beyond its usefulness for IDFC members, this ‘toolbox’ can help all financial institutions in their journey to alignment.

 

This Operationalization Framework is based on the premise that aligning with the objectives of the Paris Agreement is a comprehensive strategic process. It implies that financial institutions adapt internal priorities and procedures to make all their activities ‘consistent’ with the Paris Agreement as soon as possible and support the transformation of activities and value chains across sectors and countries.  

 

There is no single tool or metric that will allow an institution to align with the Paris Agreement. Rather, a tailored combination of tools will be needed for each financial institution, based on its individual mandate, alignment objectives and strategy, its institutional culture as well as areas and sectors of interventions.  

 

A number of already available tools, approaches and methodologies allow financial institutions to begin immediately to align with the Paris Agreement. Many tools have already been implemented as part of financial institutions’ climate mainstreaming efforts. IDFC members and other financial institutions can therefore build on this existing experience and learn from the experience of their homologues to develop their alignment strategies. These tools and methodologies may however need to be revised, adapted, or further developed to meet with the level of ambition of the Paris Agreement objectives. 

 

Given the required changes in how financial institutions operate, aligning with the Paris Agreement must be seen as a journey. In many instances, financial institutions will implement it step-by-step depending on their respective mandates and capacities; it is key that development banks prioritize their efforts. The combination of tools and metrics used by financial institutions will evolve over time as they continually review and develop new tools and approaches to respond to the societal, economic, and technological transitions.   

 

This operationalization framework is designed to serve as an initial guide to assist IDFC members in the operationalization of their commitment. It is structured around the six principles of the 2018 IDFC position paper that lays out how members aim to achieve their alignment commitment. It provides guidance on tools and approaches across four main principal questions around Paris alignment:  

 

•  Objectives: What concrete outcomes does my institution aim to achieve? 

•  Key aspects: What are the key aspects of each type of tool, what aspects do I need to pay attention to when using this type of tool? What changes may need to occur within my institution and who needs to be involved? What information do I need? 

•  Existing Approaches and Tools: What approaches and tools are available to make these changes? What are their strengths and weaknesses, how do they address the different dimensions of Paris-alignment? 

•  Use recommendations for Paris-alignment: What do I need to consider if I want to implement the principle to be fully Paris-aligned? 

 

As Paris alignment is a dynamic process, this operationalization framework will need to be revised, adapted, and further developed over time as IDFC members progress in this alignment journey and as new tools and approaches emerge. 

 

Operationalization Framework on Aligning with the Paris Agreement Download
To learn more
  • 11/28/2025 Foreword of the week
    COP30: The missed turn to implementation – and the coalitions moving ahead anyway

    COP30 concluded with an agreement, proving that multilateralism is still alive. However, the results are underwhelming: no push to transition away from fossil fuels, no decision on deforestation, and mixed outcomes on adaptation metrics.  On climate finance, Belém failed to shift from ambition to implementation. Negotiations quickly drifted back to a battle on yet another high-level quantitative target. The decision to triple adaptation funding by 2035 disappointed many, with its distant time horizon, lack of baseline and non-binding wording. COP30 also missed the opportunity to engage with – and build consensus around – concrete measures outlined in the Baku to Belém roadmap to get to $1.3 trillion. Instead, it defaulted to launching new processes – a work programme on climate finance and a ministerial roundtable on the NCQG.  

  • 11/13/2025
    How solidarity levies can help bridge the climate and development finance gap

    The climate and development finance gap is large and widening, as Official Development Assistance (ODA) declines and needs multiply. With shrinking fiscal space in vulnerable countries, solidarity levies are gaining attention as a predictable source of international finance. Launched at COP28 by Barbados, France, and Kenya, the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force (GSLTF) is the main initiative in this space.

  • 11/12/2025
    Bridging the Finance Gap: Leveraging National and Subnational Public Financial Institutions for Localised Climate and Development Action

    National Public Banks (NPBs) and Subnational Public Financial Institutions (SPFIs), including development banks and agencies as well as climate and green funds at the subnational level, play an increasingly vital role in financing climate action and the just transition. While national governments provide frameworks aligned with nationally determined contributions (NDCs), actual implementation occurs largely at the subnational level, which currently lacks sufficient funding. SPFIs can work as financial intermediaries, as they not only understand local needs and have stronger ties with local governments and businesses, but also access much larger volumes of capital from more diverse sources. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer