Publications

REGIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS INITIATIVE (RGGI): AN EMISSIONS TRADING CASE STUDY

22 April 2015 - Special issues

I4CE co-authors: Lara Dahan & Marion Afriat
EDF co-author: Katherine Rittenhouse, Daniel Francis & Peter Sopher
IETA co-author: Katie Kouchakji & Katie Sullivan

The authors would like to thank Emilie Alberola, Daniel Francis, Erica Morehouse, Nicole Singh and Nora Vogel for very helpful comments and information for this case study.

The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) is a cooperative effort among nine Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from the electric power sector. RGGI is the first mandatory trading program that caps CO2 emissions in the US through state coordinated cap-and-trade programs.
In 2014, the RGGI member states accounted for 13.1% of the US population1 and 16% of US GDP. In 2012 RGGI states were accountable for 7% (479 million tonnes CO2)1 of total US GHG emissions (6,526 million tCO2), of which 83.1 million tCO2 were emitted via electric power generation facilities from fossil fuel combustion. RGGI states have seen a significant decline in CO2 emissions from the power sector since 2010 (12.4 million tCO2). Although RGGI ranks among the top 20 ETSs globally in terms of aggregate coverage, its contribution to global GHG emissions reduction is relatively small.
RGGI was developed over several years, beginning in late 2003, to address the risks associated with climate change. On 20 December 2005, seven states (Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York and Vermont) issued a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that explained the overall goal of RGGI: to create a cap-and-trade program aimed at stabilizing and reducing emissions in participating states, while remaining consistent with overall economic growth and the maintenance of a safe and reliable electric power supply system. This MOU outlined the framework for a Model Rule which informs state practice. Massachusetts and Rhode Island signed the MOU in January 2007 after participating in the early development of RGGI, and Maryland joined the program in April 2007 after an amendment to the MOU. RGGI’s first auction of CO2 allowances was held in 2008, and the first compliance period began on 1 January, 2009.

REGIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS INITIATIVE (RGGI): AN EMISSIONS TRADING CASE STUDY Download
To learn more
  • 11/28/2025 Foreword of the week
    COP30: The missed turn to implementation – and the coalitions moving ahead anyway

    COP30 concluded with an agreement, proving that multilateralism is still alive. However, the results are underwhelming: no push to transition away from fossil fuels, no decision on deforestation, and mixed outcomes on adaptation metrics.  On climate finance, Belém failed to shift from ambition to implementation. Negotiations quickly drifted back to a battle on yet another high-level quantitative target. The decision to triple adaptation funding by 2035 disappointed many, with its distant time horizon, lack of baseline and non-binding wording. COP30 also missed the opportunity to engage with – and build consensus around – concrete measures outlined in the Baku to Belém roadmap to get to $1.3 trillion. Instead, it defaulted to launching new processes – a work programme on climate finance and a ministerial roundtable on the NCQG.  

  • 11/21/2025 Foreword of the week
    How to strengthen climate risk management and supervision to protect financial stability

    Climate change does not conform to business, political or supervisory regime cycles– its adverse long-term impacts lie beyond such horizons. Ten years ago, when Mark Carney highlighted this paradox in his landmark Tragedy of the Horizons speech, climate change was not considered a financial stability risk. Today, European supervisory stress tests estimate up to €638 billion in banking losses over 8 years, while the European Central Bank (ECB) reveals that over 90% of eurozone banks face climate and environmental risks. A key question arises: Is the supervisors’ primary focus on greening the financial system sufficient in the face of rising risks, especially stranded assets? 

  • 11/13/2025
    How solidarity levies can help bridge the climate and development finance gap

    The climate and development finance gap is large and widening, as Official Development Assistance (ODA) declines and needs multiply. With shrinking fiscal space in vulnerable countries, solidarity levies are gaining attention as a predictable source of international finance. Launched at COP28 by Barbados, France, and Kenya, the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force (GSLTF) is the main initiative in this space.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer