Free allocations under Phase 3 benchmarks: early evidence of what has changed

16 April 2013 - Carbon Trends

One of the most controversial changes to the EU ETS in Phase 3 (2013-2020) has been the introduction of emissions-performance benchmarks for determining free allocations to non-electricity producers.

Phases 1 and 2 used National Allocation Plans (NAPs). For practical reasons NAPs were drawn up by each Member State, but this led to problems, including over-generous allowance allocation, insufficiently harmonised allocations across countries and distorted incentives to reduce emissions.

Benchmarking tries to fix things by allocating the equivalent of 100% of allowances needed if every installation used the best available technology. But this is not universally popular and industries say that they might lose international competitiveness.

So a new study by I4CE and the Climate Economics Chair examined the data from the preliminary Phase 3 free allocations of 20 EU Member States and asked: how much are free allocations actually going to change with benchmarking?

Free allocations under Phase 3 benchmarks: early evidence of what has changed Download

To learn more

03/03/2026 Blog post Op-ed
To strengthen European industry, let’s strengthen the ETS

Several voices are now being heard in Europe, coming from Member States – including that of Chancellor Merz – and from industry, calling for the rules of the CO2 quota system to be weakened. For Benoît LEGUET and Jean PISANI-FERRY, this would be a mistake for Europe. And for France. On the contrary, we must strengthen this unique public policy in order to develop our industry.
02/27/2026 Foreword of the week
Risk levels and priorities: financing climate adaptation requires clear decisions

As the European Commission prepares an integrated framework on climate resilience and risk management for the EU, the public consultation has just wrapped up – an important step towards the publication of the proposals for the framework later this year. One of the main areas of focus will be the issue of financing adaptation, with the first key challenge being to mainstream the concept of resilience by design into all European funding currently under discussion, including structural policies such as the Common Agricultural Policy and the Connecting Europe Facility.
02/26/2026
Unlocking Capital for Climate Adaptation: how financing costs exacerbate needs, and ways to address them in EMDEs

Adaptation needs in emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) are rising rapidly, yet current financing assessments systematically underestimate the scale of the challenge. This paper calls for a shift from headline finance targets towards strategies that fully integrate cost of capital considerations, combining concessional finance, revenue mobilisation, and structural reforms to unlock durable and scalable investment in climate adaptation in EMDEs.

Free allocations under Phase 3 benchmarks: early evidence of what has changed

To strengthen European industry, let’s strengthen the ETS

Risk levels and priorities: financing climate adaptation requires clear decisions

Unlocking Capital for Climate Adaptation: how financing costs exacerbate needs, and ways to address them in EMDEs