The unlocked potential of carbon revenues to help fill the climate finance gap

Climate negotiations are taking place next week in Bonn, with finance once again high on the agenda.

 

COP 29 ended last year with a New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) –revised climate finance target to replace the USD 100 billion goal. The NCQG decision put forward a commitment by developed countries to lead in providing USD 300 billion per year by 2035 for developing countries, as well as a proposal to work on a roadmap to scale up climate finance for developing countries to reach a level closer to the estimated needs –the ‘Baku to Belem Roadmap to 1.3T’ (USD 1.3 trillion). The latter must be delivered at the end of the year at COP 30, and strong efforts are being put in the task by the Brazilian Presidency.

 

Yet the current global economic and geopolitical context has led to an increasingly complex landscape for international climate and development finance. Cuts in Official Development Aid (ODA) and climate finance have spread since the new Trump administration took office in the United States, as part of a part of a broader rollback of climate and development aid policies. In Europe, a growing focus on competitiveness and security, combined with fiscal constraints in several countries, is already having an impact on EU climate investments. While emerging and developing countries are confronted with increasingly limited fiscal space and debt burden that hinder their ability to invest on climate and development goals.

 

In this challenging landscape, exploring diverse policy tools to mobilize and align financial flows is more crucial than ever. Carbon pricing instruments and their revenues are part of the tools available that can help with this task. The 2025 edition of the Global Carbon Accounts, launched this week in the context of the Innovate4Climate 2025 in Sevilla, provides insights into both current and untapped potential for carbon pricing revenues to support a range of policy goals. USD 103 billion in revenues collected in 2024, 56% of revenues used for environment and development objectives, and at least USD 75 billion in revenue forgone… These are some of the key figures you will discover when reading the new edition of I4CE‘s Global Carbon Accounts.

 

 

Read the newsletter

To learn more
  • 07/02/2025 Foreword of the week
    Bridging the gap: high-level climate & development finance commitments and the reality on the ground

    The 4th International Conference on Financing for Development (FFD4) in Seville represents a milestone for delivering on development (including climate action) goals, a decade after the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement. The “Seville Commitment” was adopted on June 30th, albeit in the absence of the United States – demonstrating that widespread support remains for a comprehensive package to finance development. However, the outcome also embodies the growing chasm between high-level commitments and the reality of financing for development and climate action on the ground. Recent research by I4CE attempts to bridge this gap on two crucial issues. 

  • 07/02/2025
    From headline trillions to actual millions: climate financing needs estimates in the age of implementation

    As climate finance debates evolve from pledges to implementation, this report critically reviews the methodologies and narratives behind existing climate financing needs estimates to examine how they might be used to guide practical efforts in the years to come, and where the most urgent improvements are needed. From headline trillions to actual millions, the challenge ahead is not just about determining how much is missing – the focus should be on closing this gap in practice.

  • 03/21/2025 Blog post
    In the absence of a carbon tax in Canada, measures to fill the gap are essential 

    On his first day in office, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the elimination of the consumer carbon tax, in response to political pressures rather than evidence-based concerns about its effectiveness or impact on affordability. The tax had played a crucial role in reducing the country’s GHG emissions, and along with other carbon pricing policies, was expected to contribute nearly half of Canada’s emissions reductions by 2030. Additionally, the majority of revenues collected were redistributed to citizens, protecting vulnerable households. Thus, without alternative policies to compensate, eliminating the tax could slow emissions reductions and increase inflationary pressure, particularly for low- and middle-income families who benefited financially from the Canada Carbon Rebate funded by the tax. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer