Interactions between the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and complementary energy policies by 2030 (only in Spanish)

30 November 2015 - Special issues - By : Sylvain CAIL / Andrea BLANCO TORO

I4CE– Institute for Climate Economics and Enerdata have contributed to the Spanish Energy Journal issue 46/November 2015 by presenting their analysis on the EU ETS developement by 2030. This paper presents results from the analysis of interactions between the EU ETS and energy-climate complementary policies.

The paper desmontrates that:

  • The combination of different objectives RES, EE and CO2 will have some impact on the cost of transition to a low carbon economy. Indeed, the unique GHG emissions reduction target may be sufficient to reach a 27% share of renewable energy sources in gross final consumption, but attaining the target for energy efficiency would require a large-scale implementation of costly energy saving policies. The costs of energy efficiency policies may be profoundly affected (by a factor 4) by the coexistence of targets.
  • Interactions between different policies may induce overhead vis-à-vis an economically optimal trajectory transition towards a low carbon economy. However, complementary instruments are necessary because of a wide array of barriers to entry hampering to exploit the full decarbonization potential at lower cost in the short and long term. A whole policy mix is necessary, but its impact on the carbon price should be carefully assessed and justified in a transparent and comprehensive manner.
  • The emissions cap in the EU ETS should be set taking into account these instruments. These latter are however likely to under or over achieve their objectives, and some flexibility is necessary in the supply of allowances to improve the resilience of the EU ETS.
Interactions between the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and complementary energy policies by 2030 (only in Spanish) Download
To learn more
  • 06/13/2025 Foreword of the week
    The unlocked potential of carbon revenues to help fill the climate finance gap

    Climate negotiations are taking place next week in Bonn, with finance once again high on the agenda. COP 29 ended last year with a New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) –revised climate finance target to replace the USD 100 billion goal. The NCQG decision put forward a commitment by developed countries to lead in providing USD 300 billion per year by 2035 for developing countries, as well as a proposal to work on a roadmap to scale up climate finance for developing countries to reach a level closer to the estimated needs –the ‘Baku to Belem Roadmap to 1.3T’ (USD 1.3 trillion). The latter must be delivered at the end of the year at COP 30, and strong efforts are being put in the task by the Brazilian Presidency.

  • 06/11/2025
    Global carbon accounts 2025

    This 2025 edition of the Global Carbon Accounts presents a landscape of carbon pricing instruments through the lens of their current and potential contribution to scale up climate and development finance. Several jurisdictions are already using carbon revenues to support a range of policy objectives, including decarbonization efforts and support for economic actors most affected by the transition. Yet there is still potential for them to further contribute to fill the gap.

  • 03/21/2025 Blog post
    In the absence of a carbon tax in Canada, measures to fill the gap are essential 

    On his first day in office, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the elimination of the consumer carbon tax, in response to political pressures rather than evidence-based concerns about its effectiveness or impact on affordability. The tax had played a crucial role in reducing the country’s GHG emissions, and along with other carbon pricing policies, was expected to contribute nearly half of Canada’s emissions reductions by 2030. Additionally, the majority of revenues collected were redistributed to citizens, protecting vulnerable households. Thus, without alternative policies to compensate, eliminating the tax could slow emissions reductions and increase inflationary pressure, particularly for low- and middle-income families who benefited financially from the Canada Carbon Rebate funded by the tax. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer