Webinar I Climate assessment of local budgets: the case of Strasbourg, Paris & Oslo

- By : Morgane NICOL / Marion FETET / Antoine GOXE

 

Looking at cities’ budget can steer change by tracking expenditures that contribute or are harmful to the ecological transition. For local authorities, it is particularly at the time of the vote on their budget that it is possible to question these expenditures and to direct them as much as possible towards the climate transition. 

 

To meet these demands, the Institute for Climate Economics (I4CE) co-constructed with five French local authorities (cities of Paris and Lille, metropolises of Strasbourg, Lyon and Lille), plus the national environmental agency (Ademe), the Association of French Mayors (AMF), EIT Climate KIC and the association of large cities (France urbaine) a climate budget assessment framework for local authoritiesThis methodology freely available was presented in the webinar with the testimony of local authorities pilots that have tested its implementation.  

 

The aim of a budget climate assessment is to identify the climate impacts of each expenditure included in a local authority budget. It involves analyzing the budget line by line, based on a list – or taxonomy – of actions that are rated highly favourablefavourable, neutral, or unfavourable for the climate. This taxonomy is partly based on the current EU taxonomy on mitigation and adaptation. The results provide a better understanding of the coherence of expenditure with reaching climate goals, so as to make enlightened budget decisions. 

 

Such an assessment enables them to respond to citizens’ demands for budget transparencyto better manage their budget decisions systematically through a climate prism and to more easily identify the expenditures that could be be financed by green bonds. 

 

Two Cities’ partners gave testimony during the webinar on how they implemented the climate assessment, what results they have obtained and how they have dealt with other environmental issues. The city of Oslo presented its own approach on climate budget and how it can be complementary with the climate assessment of budget.     

 

Speakers:  

  • Morgane Nicol, Program Director – Territories 
  • Antoine Goxe, Project manager Territories and Climate 
  • Marion Fetet, Research fellow – Territories 
  • Mikael Lux, Project manager of the Climate Plan for the City and Metropolis of Strasbourg 
  • Elsa Meskel, Projet manager for a low-carbon city at the City of Paris 
  • Astrid S. Landstad, Climate advisor at the climate agency of the City of Oslo  

 

Program:  

  • What is a budget climate assessment?  
  • Why to analyze the budget through the prism of climate? 
  • What is the recommended approach? What classification do you use? 
  • How to seize the results? 
  • Some answers[ to frequently asked questions 

 

This event is a Partner Event for the EU Green Week 2021. This event is in partnership with the Covenant of Mayors Europe.

08 Jun 2021

Webinar I Climate assessment of local budgets: the case of Strasbourg, Paris & Oslo

I4CE Contacts
Marion FETET
Marion FETET
Research Fellow – Local authorities, Public Finance, Green Budgeting Email
Antoine GOXE
Antoine GOXE
Project manager Territories and Climate Email
To learn more
  • 11/28/2025 Foreword of the week
    COP30: The missed turn to implementation – and the coalitions moving ahead anyway

    COP30 concluded with an agreement, proving that multilateralism is still alive. However, the results are underwhelming: no push to transition away from fossil fuels, no decision on deforestation, and mixed outcomes on adaptation metrics.  On climate finance, Belém failed to shift from ambition to implementation. Negotiations quickly drifted back to a battle on yet another high-level quantitative target. The decision to triple adaptation funding by 2035 disappointed many, with its distant time horizon, lack of baseline and non-binding wording. COP30 also missed the opportunity to engage with – and build consensus around – concrete measures outlined in the Baku to Belém roadmap to get to $1.3 trillion. Instead, it defaulted to launching new processes – a work programme on climate finance and a ministerial roundtable on the NCQG.  

  • 11/21/2025 Foreword of the week
    How to strengthen climate risk management and supervision to protect financial stability

    Climate change does not conform to business, political or supervisory regime cycles– its adverse long-term impacts lie beyond such horizons. Ten years ago, when Mark Carney highlighted this paradox in his landmark Tragedy of the Horizons speech, climate change was not considered a financial stability risk. Today, European supervisory stress tests estimate up to €638 billion in banking losses over 8 years, while the European Central Bank (ECB) reveals that over 90% of eurozone banks face climate and environmental risks. A key question arises: Is the supervisors’ primary focus on greening the financial system sufficient in the face of rising risks, especially stranded assets? 

  • 11/13/2025
    How solidarity levies can help bridge the climate and development finance gap

    The climate and development finance gap is large and widening, as Official Development Assistance (ODA) declines and needs multiply. With shrinking fiscal space in vulnerable countries, solidarity levies are gaining attention as a predictable source of international finance. Launched at COP28 by Barbados, France, and Kenya, the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force (GSLTF) is the main initiative in this space.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer