Mobilising banks in the transition: supervisors must have better use of risk management

16 February 2024 - Foreword of the week - By : Romain HUBERT

The European Union is continuing its efforts to ensure that the banking system takes climate change into account. Banks will have to draw up a “transition plan”, according to the European Banking Authority’s (EBA) guidelines that are out for consultation until April.  One could hope that the banking authorities would seize this opportunity to encourage banks to better finance the transition, since their voluntary commitments are not sufficient. But the EBA does not make it a clear objective.

 

For the EBA, the explicit aim of these climate plans is to ensure that banks are resilient to the risks associated with the transition and climate impacts. Can we expect any benefit in terms of mobilising banks for climate action?

 

Not as it stands. The proposal simply asks banks to manage their exposure to financial risks linked to climate impacts and to the EU’s transition objectives. Typically, a bank will have to assess whether oil companies risk losing their ability to repay their loans because of the transition. And the answer may be no, if the bank thinks that one or more companies will be financially robust long enough to repay its loan, or if the bank considers that the transition scenarios generating the largest financial impacts are not very credible…

 

But still looking at it from the prudential perspective, which is a responsibility of the banking authorities, it would be in our interest to encourage the transition for the sake of risk management. The greatest risk to the financial system in Europe is above all the lack of a transition, which would lead to repetitve and unmanageable climate impacts that are still underestimated. The prudential authorities must therefore take up this objective, and the challenge is to define how. In particular, it will be necessary to remain consistent with governments’ action plans, while monitoring banks’ ability to take on risk to finance the transition. Transition plans should help!

 

In I4CE‘s newsletter of this week, you will discover our report which discusses the links between risk management and the mobilisation of the banking sector for the transition. You will also find our recommendations for strengthening the EBA’s proposal, and rethinking more broadly the link between prudential regulation and governments’ climate action.

 

Read the newsletter

To learn more
  • 04/11/2024
    I4CE’s recommendations to the Basel Committee on the disclosure of climate-related risks

    After a first step in 2022, the Basel Committee on Banking supervision is finally moving towards regulation for climate-related risks. Founded in 1974, this forum brings together financial supervisors of the G20 countries and establishes the common standards for financial stability. Two years ago, the Committee published a consultative document on the principles of climate […]

  • 01/26/2024 Foreword of the week
    Failing to plan is planning to fail: Prudential transition plans and European Banking Authority consultation

    After nearly 4 years of negotiations, the European Union has just reached an agreement to reform the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) for banks. The inclusion of climate change is a major step forward: banks will have to draw up prudential transition plans, supervised by the European Central Bank. These plans will complement the European regulatory architecture that is being put in place for large companies, with the Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Due Diligences Directive (CSDD). Are these banking transition plans a sufficient breakthrough to finally commit banks to climate neutrality? The answer to this question will depend on the implementation of EU legislation.

  • 12/08/2023 Foreword of the week
    Private finance: it’s time to rethink the European strategy

    There is a broad consensus that private finance has an important role to play in financing the climate transition, given the scale of needs and the constraints on public finances. Beyond investments in climate alone, all financial activities must be reoriented to be compatible with the transition. This shift cannot take place on a voluntary basis at the scale and speed required. The inactivity of financial players, the weight of past financing, and the demands of shareholder profitability limit the effectiveness of voluntary international initiatives to which private financial players commit themselves.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer