Corporate due diligence: what is the added value for climate?

30 March 2023 - Op-ed - By : Romain HUBERT

Negotiations are under way on the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, commonly known as the “CSDDD”. Regarding climate, an obligation of climate transition plan for companies is discussed. But let’s keep careful on this point. Europe is in the process of developing climate transition plan requirements in two other directives on corporate sustainability reporting (CSRD) and on prudential requirements for banks (CRD). We must therefore ensure that the discussions result in a final version of the CSDDD that is consistent with these other texts and at the same time complementary.


The importance of corporate climate transition plans

Before coming back to the issues of consistency between all these directives, a quick reminder on climate transition plans. It is a roadmap where the company may detail its strategic objectives, targets and actions to align its activities with the objectives of the Paris Agreement, that is, limiting global warming below 1.5°C to 2°C. The credibility of the transition plan reflects how serious the company really is in its effort to do its share in limiting global warming.


The EU has first introduced the transition plan concept with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, the CSRD. It requires companies to disclose from 2025 their transition plan – if they have a plan. But it does not ensure that companies will effectively prepare a credible plan and that they will implement their plan.


Holding companies accountable for their commitments

This is where the CSDDD can make a difference. If the final version of the directive reflects the most ambitious proposals put on the table so far, it will force companies not only to prepare a credible transition plan but also to actually implement it. More importantly, it will expose them to sanctions if they fail to do so. Two types of complementary sanctions are proposed: the first involves the company’s civil liability before the courts; the second involves an administrative authority that can impose, for example, pecuniary sanctions.


However, there is still a lot of uncertainty about how ambitious the final text will be. This calls for several points of attention for the negotiation process of the directive.


The first point of attention is that the text must clearly formulate both the obligation to implement a plan and the applicable sanctions. At this stage, the obligation to implement the transition plan only appears in some of the Parliament’s interim discussion documents. Moreover, the directive currently provides for sanctions on a wide range of environmental and human rights issues, but their application to climate is yet to be clarified.



Read more on Euractiv’

I4CE Contacts
Research Fellow – Climate risks, Adaptation and financial institutions Email
To learn more
  • 04/25/2024
    I4CE’s recommendations to the European Banking Authority on prudential transition plans

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) is clarifying how the banks should frame their “transition plan” as required by the EU prudential regulation. The transition plan is the bank’s strategic roadmap to prepare for the transition to a sustainable economy as framed by the jurisdictions they operate in, including an EU climate-neutral economy. It has been introduced in several EU regulatory frameworks, including as a disclosure requirement arising from the CSRD. The prudential framework and the EBA are focusing on a specific angle: how the banks plan to manage their financial risks related to the transition. EBA’s framing of these plans will be key to determine whether the banks will manage their financial risks consistently with the broader need of financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. 

  • 04/11/2024
    I4CE’s recommendations to the Basel Committee on the disclosure of climate-related risks

    After a first step in 2022, the Basel Committee on Banking supervision is finally moving towards regulation for climate-related risks. Founded in 1974, this forum brings together financial supervisors of the G20 countries and establishes the common standards for financial stability. Two years ago, the Committee published a consultative document on the principles of climate […]

  • 02/16/2024 Foreword of the week
    Mobilising banks in the transition: supervisors must have better use of risk management

    The European Union is continuing its efforts to ensure that the banking system takes climate change into account. Banks will have to draw up a “transition plan”, according to the European Banking Authority’s (EBA) guidelines that are out for consultation until April.  One could hope that the banking authorities would seize this opportunity to encourage banks to better finance the transition, since their voluntary commitments are not sufficient. But the EBA does not make it a clear objective.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !