Corporate due diligence: what is the added value for climate?

30 March 2023 - Op-ed - By : Romain HUBERT

Negotiations are under way on the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, commonly known as the “CSDDD”. Regarding climate, an obligation of climate transition plan for companies is discussed. But let’s keep careful on this point. Europe is in the process of developing climate transition plan requirements in two other directives on corporate sustainability reporting (CSRD) and on prudential requirements for banks (CRD). We must therefore ensure that the discussions result in a final version of the CSDDD that is consistent with these other texts and at the same time complementary.


The importance of corporate climate transition plans

Before coming back to the issues of consistency between all these directives, a quick reminder on climate transition plans. It is a roadmap where the company may detail its strategic objectives, targets and actions to align its activities with the objectives of the Paris Agreement, that is, limiting global warming below 1.5°C to 2°C. The credibility of the transition plan reflects how serious the company really is in its effort to do its share in limiting global warming.


The EU has first introduced the transition plan concept with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, the CSRD. It requires companies to disclose from 2025 their transition plan – if they have a plan. But it does not ensure that companies will effectively prepare a credible plan and that they will implement their plan.


Holding companies accountable for their commitments

This is where the CSDDD can make a difference. If the final version of the directive reflects the most ambitious proposals put on the table so far, it will force companies not only to prepare a credible transition plan but also to actually implement it. More importantly, it will expose them to sanctions if they fail to do so. Two types of complementary sanctions are proposed: the first involves the company’s civil liability before the courts; the second involves an administrative authority that can impose, for example, pecuniary sanctions.


However, there is still a lot of uncertainty about how ambitious the final text will be. This calls for several points of attention for the negotiation process of the directive.


The first point of attention is that the text must clearly formulate both the obligation to implement a plan and the applicable sanctions. At this stage, the obligation to implement the transition plan only appears in some of the Parliament’s interim discussion documents. Moreover, the directive currently provides for sanctions on a wide range of environmental and human rights issues, but their application to climate is yet to be clarified.



Read more on Euractiv’

I4CE Contacts
Research Fellow – Climate risks, Adaptation and financial institutions Email
To learn more
  • 03/31/2023 Foreword of the week
    Sustainable Finance: the EU enters the final stretch

    Elections of the European Parliament are coming up in June 2024 and will be followed by the renewal of the Commission. Hence, there are only a few months left to finalize the implementation of the renewed sustainable finance strategy adopted in 2021. This strategy aims, among other things, to increase the contribution of the financial sector to sustainability. It seems too early to already draw conclusions on how the Commission delivered on its objectives as some key legislative and supervisory processes are still under way. This newsletter focusses on some of these ongoing processes that receive quite some attention in the public debate

  • 03/30/2023
    Climate stress tests: what co-benefits can we expect for transition financing

    Since their introduction, climate stress tests have taken a lot of space in the public debate. Put in the spotlight by supervisors and the NGFS, their primary objective is to encourage banks to integrate climate-related risks into their activities and to carry out an initial assessment of the banks’ capacity to deal with these risks.

  • 02/17/2023 Foreword of the week
    Climate transition plans for banks: European legislators on a razor’s edge

    The proposal for mandatory climate transition plans for banks is slowly making its way through the regulatory debate. Proposed by the European Commission and confirmed by the EU Council, this proposal has now also been taken up by the European Parliament. This obligation could be a game-changer for financial risk management and the alignment of financial flows with the transition to a low-carbon economy. It could lead banks to limit their activities in climate-damaging activities, adjust their business models, review their strategies as well as their governance and risk management procedures.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !