Scenario analysis of transition risk in finance – Towards strategic integration of deep uncertainty

8 June 2022 - Climate Report - By : Romain HUBERT / Rachel Paya / Anuschka HILKE / Michel CARDONA

The restructuring of the economy towards a low-carbon system will lead to develop activities that are aligned with the needs of a net zero economy, to restructure others in order to make them compatible with these needs and to stop harmful activities. The financial sector needs to anticipate these dynamics to address strategic risks and seize opportunities for their financial service business. However, financial actors are not inherently equipped to factor in this transition risk characterized by the complexity and multiplicity of potential transition pathway, as well as the impossibility to define an objective probability distribution of future outcomes. This characteristic of transition risk is called “deep uncertainty”.


The need to clarify how financial actors should use scenario analysis for a strategic integration of deep uncertainty

As recommended by the TCFD, scenario analysis can be particularly useful to ensure proper strategic integration of the deep uncertainty around the low-carbon transition. Mainly through disclosure requirements, regulators have invited financial actors to implement the scenario analysis process and to account for its strategic consequences.


However, financial actors have disclosed patchy information on scenario analysis and its strategic use so far. They have often relied on third-party methodologies that can lack transparency and that face a range of common challenges.


While financial actors and regulators are gaining experience with scenario analysis, they may face difficulties identifying what should be done to ensure the strategic relevance of the exercise – including the appropriate integration of deep uncertainty.


A report defining good principles of scenario analysis for a strategic integration of deep uncertainty

I4CE has defined a range of theoretical good principles that should be implemented. They were defined based on: the review of analytical frameworks used by a range of service providers; insights from strategic foresight approaches applied in industrial contexts; research on decision-making under deep uncertainty.


As illustrated below, the principles are categorized according to six building blocks focusing on major aspects of a scenario analysis process that are necessary for a strategic integration of deep uncertainty. They are neither exhaustive nor representative of the chronological order of the steps of the process in practice.


The full report summarizes the principles as a checklist (see the short version in the executive summary and the complete version in the core report). The checklist covers not only technical aspects, but also organizational aspects to ensure the appropriate mobilization of the teams.


The checklist can be used for instance by financial actors to improve their internal approach and challenge their service providers, and by financial regulators and supervisors to clarify their expectations, through disclosure requirements and the review of internal risk management practices.



Click on this button to see the image



Several stakeholders should be mobilized to foster the effective implementation of the good principles

The methodological approaches to scenario analysis in finance comprise emerging relevant practices. However, as illustrated below, they also face several common challenges. The full report makes recommendations to address these challenges and stimulate the generalization of already relevant practices. While financial regulators and supervisors should guide scenario analysis implementation, a broader range of stakeholders should also collaborate to address the needs.



Click on this button to see the image



This report is part of the Finance ClimAct project and was produced with the contribution of the European Union LIFE programme. This work reflects only the views of I4CE – Institute for Climate Economics. Other members of the Finance ClimAct Consortium and the European Commission are not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.







With the contribution of the European Union LIFE programme

Scenario analysis of transition risk in finance – Towards strategic integration of deep uncertainty Download
I4CE Contacts
Project Manager – Financial regulation and Europe Email
Anuschka HILKE
Anuschka HILKE
Program Director – Financial Institutions Email
Senior associate Expert - Financial Sector, Risks and Climate Change Email
To learn more
  • 03/31/2023 Foreword of the week
    Sustainable Finance: the EU enters the final stretch

    Elections of the European Parliament are coming up in June 2024 and will be followed by the renewal of the Commission. Hence, there are only a few months left to finalize the implementation of the renewed sustainable finance strategy adopted in 2021. This strategy aims, among other things, to increase the contribution of the financial sector to sustainability. It seems too early to already draw conclusions on how the Commission delivered on its objectives as some key legislative and supervisory processes are still under way. This newsletter focusses on some of these ongoing processes that receive quite some attention in the public debate

  • 03/30/2023
    Climate stress tests: what co-benefits can we expect for transition financing

    Since their introduction, climate stress tests have taken a lot of space in the public debate. Put in the spotlight by supervisors and the NGFS, their primary objective is to encourage banks to integrate climate-related risks into their activities and to carry out an initial assessment of the banks’ capacity to deal with these risks.

  • 03/30/2023 Op-ed
    OP-ED – Corporate due diligence: what is the added value for climate?

    Negotiations are under way on the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, commonly known as the “CSDDD”. Regarding climate, an obligation of climate transition plan for companies is discussed. But let’s keep careful on this point. Europe is in the process of developing climate transition plan requirements in two other directives on corporate sustainability reporting (CSRD) and on prudential requirements for banks (CRD). We must therefore ensure that the discussions result in a final version of the CSDDD that is consistent with these other texts and at the same time complementary.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !