Publications Public finance

A first 360-degree climate assessment of France’s State budget

1 October 2019 - Climate Report - By : Marion FETET / Sébastien POSTIC, Phd / Quentin PERRIER, PhD

The vote on the state budget is a key moment in the fight against climate change. In France,more than 250 budget measures have been identified: expenditures, tax exemptions, taxes, all of which have a significant influence, upward or downward, on national greenhouse gas emissions. 250 reasons to keep a close eye on the state budget.

 

The Budget Law vote: an important moment for the climate

Every year in France, the State raises several hundred billion euros in various taxes – about a quarter of the national GDP – and channels an equal or even slightly higher amount toward public expenditures. Bringing the budget and taxation in line with the national objective of carbon neutrality is therefore a huge step forward in the national fight against climate change.

Yet, the task is vast. Improving support measures for households in the low-carbon transition, reforming fuel tax exemptions, greening taxation… We can no longer limit ourselves to the few flagship measures on which the political debate tends to focus, such as the carbon tax, or tax exemptions for aircraft kerosene. We must be aware of, and recognize, all the budgetary measures that have an influence on France’s greenhouse gas emissions. This study therefore aims to analyse the entire French budget in terms of
its impact on the climate.

The Institute for Climate Economics (I4CE) proposes here a 360-degree climate assessment of the state budget, excluding social security (which is voted separately). More than 250 budget measures have been identified; expenditures, tax exemptions, taxes, all of which have a significant influence, upward or downward, on national greenhouse gas emissions. Some of them are the direct result of the State’s efforts to reduce emissions, and were created for this purpose; however, for the most part, these measures initially aimed at another main objective, making it all the more necessary to identify their effect on the climate.

 

More than 250 measures to keep on policymakers’ radar

All the measures we have identified deserve to be on the radar of politicians, the administration, or NGOs, even if some represent billions of euros and others, only millions. All of them are available by downloading this Excel file (in French).

This document also provides answers to several questions that have emerged with the ‘yellow vest’ movement: how much does the government spend to help households and businesses reduce their greenhouse gas emissions? How much does the state collect in the name of climate? And who is exempt from this tax effort?

 

Is the State budget aligned with the Paris Agreement?

As for whether the State’s current budget is sufficient to achieve carbon neutrality, this question cannot be answered with a single figure or indicator. On the other hand, this study shows that climate-damaging measures cover €17 billion, mostly made up of tax exemptions on petroleum products. These tax breaks will have to be gradually reformed. Climate friendly spending and tax exemptions, on the other hand, amount to €20 billion. This effort will most likely have to increase in the future. Finally, it can be seen that 7% of the taxes analysed are beneficial to climate action: a significant share, but one that should grow in the medium term, with or without a carbon tax, with or without increasing the overall tax level in France.

Cliquez sur ce bouton pour voir l’image

 

The climate assessment of France’s State budget is carried out with the technical and financial support of ADEME and the European Climate Foundation.

A first 360-degree climate assessment of France’s State budget Download
I4CE Contacts
Marion FETET
Marion FETET
Research fellow – Local authorities and Carbon pricing Email
Sébastien POSTIC, Phd
Sébastien POSTIC, Phd
Project Manager – International and Carbon pricing Email
To learn more
  • 02/10/2023 Foreword of the week
    How the EU can match the US Inflation Reduction-Act

    Last August, the US Congress adopted the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). It became the epicentre of EU fears of seeing cleantech projects, like battery or solar panel gigafactories, settling in the US rather than in the EU. There is some rationality behind that fear. The IRA indeed provides sizable public funding, with 10 years predictability and the simplicity of having a single federal level scheme. Moreover, the IRA does not only subsidize cleantech manufacturing. For instance, in the case of electric vehicles, the IRA supports the mining of critical minerals, the manufacturing of the battery, the purchase of the electric car and the production of renewable electricity. In other words, with IRA the US now has a genuine long-term climate investment plan.

  • 02/09/2023
    Think house, not brick: building an EU Cleantech Investment Plan to match the US Inflation Reduction Act

    For years, the European Union assumed it would lead the cleantech race because it was the only one running in it. Mistakenly so. With the Inflation Reduction Act, the US quickly catches up. This brief argues that the best EU policy answer to the IRA is an EU long‑term climate investment plan. As the political appetite for such a plan is currently limited, the European Commission should use the political momentum to propose a targeted investment plan that focuses on the development, scale-up, manufacturing and deployment of clean technologies in the EU. It identifies three first bricks that can already be laid out to build this plan.

  • 11/10/2022 Foreword of the week
    COP27: the importance of national financing strategies for the transition

    This year again, expectations for the COP are high regarding developed countries’ commitments towards the funding of action against climate change and its impacts. The question of loss and damage, which pertains to questions of climate justice and of who should pay for the significant impacts of climate change endured by the poorest countries, has just been added to the official COP agenda. And climate finance will again be a hot topic: the pledge made back in 2009 by rich nations to channel US$100bn every year by 2020 to help less wealthy nations mitigate the rise in temperatures and adapt to climate change is still falling short of targets.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer