Carbon Tax : France can learn from foreign experiences to move forward

12 May 2019 - Climate Brief - By : Sébastien POSTIC, Phd / Clément METIVIER

France is by no means the only country with difficulties – that is an understatement – in introducing an accepted carbon tax. And not the only one to have taken up the challenge of a public policy leading to higher energy prices for households and businesses. In 2018, the World Bank identified 29 countries or provinces that had a carbon tax. There were also 28 carbon markets around the world, and that’s not counting the countries that have significantly reduced their fossil fuel subsidies.

How have these countries managed to raise energy prices while addressing the social and economic challenges that this raises? How did they use the additional tax revenue to do this? What lessons can we try to draw for France?

To answer these questions, I4CE, the Institute for Climate Economics analysed ten countries from four different continents that have tackled the challenge of putting a price on carbon and, more generally, of increasing in energy prices.

Foreign experiences will not tell France what to do. There is no magic formula. However, there are three lessons for France’s carbon tax.

  • The first is to be transparent on the use of tax revenues, before even increasing it
  • The second lesson is to make the counterparts of this tax visible.
  • The third is that increasing energy taxes is a political challenge, which takes time, and that France will have to learn from its mistakes to adapt and move forward with this necessary reform.

Given its own political context, marked by some mistrust of taxes and a need for protection of the middle and working classes, France has three options for using carbon tax revenues. Those options, detailed in the report, all consist in “returning the money” one way or another, and to return it by wearing a special attention to low-income households.

The full report is available in French on the following link:

 

Carbon Tax : France can learn from foreign experiences to move forward Download
I4CE Contacts
Sébastien POSTIC, Phd
Sébastien POSTIC, Phd
Research Fellow – Public finance, Development Email
To learn more
  • 11/07/2025 Foreword of the week
    COP30: On Financing, the Time for Negotiation Is Over

    “What agreement will the negotiators reach?” is the question that is usually on climate practitioners’ minds at this time of the year. However, this time, it is a new impetus that is needed, not another agreement. 10 years after the Paris Agreement, the Brazilian COP30 presidency has rightly shifted the focus to execution, making this edition “the implementation COP.” On financing, the objectives set at COP29 are clear: developing countries should receive $300 billion per year by 2035 from developed countries (NCQG), and mobilise $1.3 trillion per year from all actors. The newly published “Baku to Belém” roadmap proposes solutions to meet the targets. We now have objectives and a list of (theoretical) means to achieve them. How do we move to implementation? 

  • 11/05/2025 Blog post
    From Pledges to Progress: Climate Finance a Decade After Paris

    Nearly a decade has passed since the Paris Agreement elevated finance to the heart of the climate agenda, embedding in Article 2.1(c) the ambitious goal of aligning global financial flows with low-emission, climate-resilient development. But for all the talk of “shifting the trillions,” we remain far from course. 

  • 10/28/2025
    From targets to action: the climate finance agenda needs a new impetus in Belèm

    Ten years after the adoption of the Paris Agreement, what progress has been made to make financial flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development (the ambition set out in Article 2.1(c) of the Agreement)? And what is needed going forward? Although we still lack a comprehensive assessment of progress, this article draws on existing analysis of what can help align financial flows and examines the efforts made by governments and the financial sector to this end. It highlights a development in the debate towards a country-driven approach and a focus on real investment needs. It explores ways to overcome existing barriers to action despite a challenging global context. The article advocates that Article 2.1(c) should be viewed not as a stand-alone provision, but as something that requires full implementation of all the provisions of the Paris Agreement. It also calls for a shift from a target-focused to an action-focused finance agenda and discusses how the COP30 in Belém can contribute to this.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer