Publications Financial regulation

Is financial regulation in France in line with the Paris Agreement?

28 May 2019 - Climate Brief - By : Julie EVAIN / Michel CARDONA

The financial system has an important role to play in financing the transition of the economy and the drastic reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and must take into account in its activities the risks that climate change poses to it. The French government has begun to mobilize on the subject, as have the Paris financial centre and the various institutions that supervise the financial system . What is the outcome of these actions: is financial regulation in France equal to the Paris Agreement?

In order to answer this question, the Institute for Climate Economics (I4CE) and the Frankfurt School – UNEP Centre reviewed the entire French regulatory framework applicable to the financial system in order to identify its strengths, weaknesses and therefore its necessary changes. This qualitative analysis is summarized by a rating, assigned in the most transparent way possible.

This study shows that the French regulatory framework has solid advantages, particularly compared to the European, German and Dutch frameworks analysed elsewhere. This advance is due in particular to the mandatory climate disclosures for investors, obligations that date back to the Energy Transition Law for Green Growth of 2015 and have made France a pioneering country in this field . The more recent awareness of financial supervisors in France and a strong financial market dynamic are also assets.

But on other issues the delay is significant or practices are only beginning to change. This is particularly the case for the supervision of asset managers who do not integrate climate issues or informing consumers about the climate impact of their financial investments. France is also lagging behind in taking climate change into account in national accounting standards or education and training in green and sustainable finance.

Finally, on many subjects, France has a rather wait-and-see attitude towards Europe: it prefers to wait for the introduction of new European standards. This is particularly the case for the modification of prudential regulation in order, for example, to better take into account the risks related to climate change in the calculation of the capital required from banks. This wait-and-see attitude is also reflected in the consideration of climate in investors’ fiduciary duty, or in the establishment of a taxonomy of “green” economic activities.

This evaluation exercise reveals that, although France is one of the leaders in green finance, there is still a long way to go to achieve a regulatory framework that is fully in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. The progress made in some areas should not obscure the collective work that remains to be pursued.

Plus d’informations: 

3fP, finance fit for Paris:
The results of this analysis are part of a European project 3fP “Finance fit for Paris” developed jointly by the Frankfurt School – UNEP Collaborating Centre for Climate & Sustainable Energy Finance (FS-UNEP Centre) and WWF Germany, supported by the European Climate Foundation. This project aims to analyse the compatibility between the regulatory frameworks of financial actors and the Paris Agreement. The analysis focuses on three dimensions: transparency and reporting; supervision and financial stability; and the enabling environment for the development of green finance.
For France, the evaluation is co-executed by I4CE and the FS-UNEP Centre. The 3fP-Tracker site currently includes assessments for the regulatory frameworks of the EU, France, the Netherlands and Germany. Spain and Italy will be the next countries to be analysed.
These assessments will be updated annually to take into account changes in the various regulations and practices of the financial markets.

In France, there are five financial regulatory and supervisory bodies: the Ministry of the Economy and Finance, the Banque de France, the Authority for Prudential Control and Resolution, the Financial Markets Authority and the Ministry of Ecological and Inclusive Transition for the provisions relating to Article 173-VI.

 https://www.i4ce.org/download/article-173-vi-bilan-du-reporting-climat-apres-deux-ans-dapplication/

 

Download the document:

Is financial regulation in France in line with the Paris Agreement? Download
I4CE Contacts
Julie EVAIN
Julie EVAIN
Research Fellow – Financial regulation, Prudential transition plans Email
Michel CARDONA
Michel CARDONA
Senior associate Expert – Financial Sector, Risks and Climate Change Email
To learn more
  • 04/11/2024
    I4CE’s recommendations to the Basel Committee on the disclosure of climate-related risks

    After a first step in 2022, the Basel Committee on Banking supervision is finally moving towards regulation for climate-related risks. Founded in 1974, this forum brings together financial supervisors of the G20 countries and establishes the common standards for financial stability. Two years ago, the Committee published a consultative document on the principles of climate […]

  • 02/16/2024 Foreword of the week
    Mobilising banks in the transition: supervisors must have better use of risk management

    The European Union is continuing its efforts to ensure that the banking system takes climate change into account. Banks will have to draw up a “transition plan”, according to the European Banking Authority’s (EBA) guidelines that are out for consultation until April.  One could hope that the banking authorities would seize this opportunity to encourage banks to better finance the transition, since their voluntary commitments are not sufficient. But the EBA does not make it a clear objective.

  • 02/14/2024
    Connecting the dots between climate risk management and transition finance

    A report to clarify linkages between these two approaches to climate action for the financial sector. The mobilization of the sector is necessary to help to finance the low-carbon transition. Some stakeholders thus advocate the explicit mobilization of the sector in favor of financing the transition. This rationale for action is known as the “transition finance approach”. The sector is also exposed to the financial risks arising from climate change and the necessary transition. This observation motivates a rationale for action known as te “risk approach”, aimed at managing the exposure of financial institutions to such risks.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer