Publications

Fossil fuel subsidy reforms: state of play and ways forward

BACKGROUND:

Fossil fuel subsidies are incompatible with the low carbon energy transition

 

SUMMARY:

Promoting the production and consumption of fossil fuels through subsidies is incompatible with the Paris Agreement on climate change.

While G20 countries have committed to phase out “inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption” since 2009, the progress towards reform has been mixed. The G20 countries still provide about USD 70 billion in production fossil fuel subsidies, while the total global consumption subsidies are estimated to be in the range of USD 320 billion to USD 5 trillion per year.

Recent examples demonstrate that subsidy reforms, combined with compensation mechanisms, are feasible. While there is no silver bullet to tackle the fossil fuel subsidy issue – and some of them are actually necessary –, the next steps towards a sounder and more efficient approach to fossil fuel subsidies may include:

 

  • Establish clear action roadmaps for the reform of fossil fuel subsidies;
  • Work within existing platforms such as the WTO to refine existing definitions in the specific case of fossil fuel subsidies;
  • Reinforce existing peer-review processes and extend them through international cooperation platforms such as the UNFCCC;
  • Use transparency frameworks to improve the national and international reporting on fossil fuel subsidies and their reform;
  • Reinforce international initiatives that allow for transnational research, such as the Global Subsidy Initiative and the OECD/IEA works, and efforts such as the World Bank’s of IMF’s that foster capacity building on these issues.
Fossil fuel subsidy reforms: state of play and ways forward Download
I4CE Contacts
Dr. Sébastien POSTIC
Dr. Sébastien POSTIC
Chef de projet – Finances publiques, développement Email
Sébastien POSTIC, Phd
Sébastien POSTIC, Phd
Project Manager – Public finance, development Email
To learn more
  • 09/20/2023 Hors série
    Climate: the risk of polarisation – Annual Report 2023

    I4CE produit des expertises innovantes afin d’informer les débats sur les politiques publiques pour la transition climatique. Mais nous ne faisons pas qu’écrire des rapports, nous voulons avoir de l’impact. Nous allons au contact des décideurs, des médias, des parties prenantes pour apprendre d’eux et faire que ces politiques progressent, concrètement. Nous vous invitons, en parcourant notre rapport d’activité, à découvrir les débats qui intéressent I4CE, les changements majeurs de politique publique des douze derniers mois et comment nous y avons contribués.

  • 09/15/2023 Foreword of the week
    From denial to acceptance: Europe’s next step in the cleantech race

    Psychologists sometimes talk about the five stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. One year on from the announcement of the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the European response has looked startlingly similar. Public anger in Brussels at perceived American protectionism. Private sector depression at the prospect of Europe falling behind in the global cleantech race. Denial of the gap between the EU and US efforts, by arguing that that all EU and national spending on cleantech amounts to a conservative estimate of what the IRA offers (while not factoring in the full range of US support). 

  • 09/13/2023
    The sharpest tool in the box: how to strenghten the European Union Innovation Fund for climate competitiveness and security

    The European Union (EU) Innovation Fund is Europe’s largest fund for climate innovation. It has a keyrole to play in European climate action, energy security and technological leadership. To unleash the full potential of European cleantech, greater public support is needed to help more companies and projects cross the so-called “valleys of death” that are inherent to cleantech innovation and scale-up. In this endeavour, relying solely on national public funds would create two risks. In countries where governments do not rise to the financing challenge, innovators will fail or flee. Conversely, governments with the fiscal means to spend big on cleantech may create a harmful subsidy race among EU member states, undermining EU solidarity and the integrity of the EU Single Market.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer