Interactions between the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and complementary energy policies by 2030 (only in Spanish)

30 November 2015 - Special issues - By : Sylvain CAIL / Andrea BLANCO TORO

I4CE– Institute for Climate Economics and Enerdata have contributed to the Spanish Energy Journal issue 46/November 2015 by presenting their analysis on the EU ETS developement by 2030. This paper presents results from the analysis of interactions between the EU ETS and energy-climate complementary policies.

The paper desmontrates that:

  • The combination of different objectives RES, EE and CO2 will have some impact on the cost of transition to a low carbon economy. Indeed, the unique GHG emissions reduction target may be sufficient to reach a 27% share of renewable energy sources in gross final consumption, but attaining the target for energy efficiency would require a large-scale implementation of costly energy saving policies. The costs of energy efficiency policies may be profoundly affected (by a factor 4) by the coexistence of targets.
  • Interactions between different policies may induce overhead vis-à-vis an economically optimal trajectory transition towards a low carbon economy. However, complementary instruments are necessary because of a wide array of barriers to entry hampering to exploit the full decarbonization potential at lower cost in the short and long term. A whole policy mix is necessary, but its impact on the carbon price should be carefully assessed and justified in a transparent and comprehensive manner.
  • The emissions cap in the EU ETS should be set taking into account these instruments. These latter are however likely to under or over achieve their objectives, and some flexibility is necessary in the supply of allowances to improve the resilience of the EU ETS.
Interactions between the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and complementary energy policies by 2030 (only in Spanish) Download
To learn more
  • 11/07/2025 Foreword of the week
    COP30: On Financing, the Time for Negotiation Is Over

    “What agreement will the negotiators reach?” is the question that is usually on climate practitioners’ minds at this time of the year. However, this time, it is a new impetus that is needed, not another agreement. 10 years after the Paris Agreement, the Brazilian COP30 presidency has rightly shifted the focus to execution, making this edition “the implementation COP.” On financing, the objectives set at COP29 are clear: developing countries should receive $300 billion per year by 2035 from developed countries (NCQG), and mobilise $1.3 trillion per year from all actors. The newly published “Baku to Belém” roadmap proposes solutions to meet the targets. We now have objectives and a list of (theoretical) means to achieve them. How do we move to implementation? 

  • 11/05/2025 Blog post
    From Pledges to Progress: Climate Finance a Decade After Paris

    Nearly a decade has passed since the Paris Agreement elevated finance to the heart of the climate agenda, embedding in Article 2.1(c) the ambitious goal of aligning global financial flows with low-emission, climate-resilient development. But for all the talk of “shifting the trillions,” we remain far from course. 

  • 10/28/2025
    From targets to action: the climate finance agenda needs a new impetus in Belèm

    Ten years after the adoption of the Paris Agreement, what progress has been made to make financial flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development (the ambition set out in Article 2.1(c) of the Agreement)? And what is needed going forward? Although we still lack a comprehensive assessment of progress, this article draws on existing analysis of what can help align financial flows and examines the efforts made by governments and the financial sector to this end. It highlights a development in the debate towards a country-driven approach and a focus on real investment needs. It explores ways to overcome existing barriers to action despite a challenging global context. The article advocates that Article 2.1(c) should be viewed not as a stand-alone provision, but as something that requires full implementation of all the provisions of the Paris Agreement. It also calls for a shift from a target-focused to an action-focused finance agenda and discusses how the COP30 in Belém can contribute to this.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer