Menu
FR
search
Publications Agriculture and food

Assessing the sustainability of the French food system: methodological issues and results

14 October 2021 - Climate Report - By : Claudine FOUCHEROT / Hadrien HAINAUT / Lucile ROGISSART

To learn more about the methodology used by I4CE to assess the contribution of financing flows to the emergence of a sustainable food system, this technical paper introduces it and identifies its limitations and key methodological challenges for the future.

 

The transition of the French food system towards a sustainable development model is essential from the perspective of climate change mitigation, adaptation to climate change consequences, protection of biodiversity, soil and water, as well as protection of the health of farmers and consumers in general. The implementation of this transition however is complex, especially given the economic context of the stakeholders involved in the food chain.

 

The financial lever is one of the various levers available to steer this transition. In ‘Décryptage des financements du système alimentaire français et de leur contribution aux enjeux de durabilité’ (2021)I4CE has drawn up an initial estimate of the number of financial flows that cross the food system and their contribution to sustainability. The resulting conclusion is that activating the financial lever has two components: financing investments that transform the means of production in the long term and securing the income of sustainable production methods so that they are economically viable.

 

This working paper discusses the methodology we have used to assess the contribution of financing flows to the emergence of a sustainable food system.

 

The following methodological challenges have been identified :

 

• The definition of a clear and consensual parameter for the food system, the links that form it and the financial flows involved.

• The consensual definition of a sustainable food system, which simultaneously satisfies environmental, social, and economic objectives.

• The evaluation of the funding in relation to the objective of a sustainable food system, whist considering that:
– information on the projects and products funded is incomplete, and knowledge of the funding levels necessary to achieve a sustainable food system is negligible;
– in contrast to the energy sector, where the objective is to replace fossil fuels entirely with renewable sources, a sustainable food system is characterised by complex balances that make it difficult to distinguish between financing that is favourable or unfavourable to the transition.

 

Click on this button to see the image

 

In response to these challenges, we propose a methodology and present the results here.

The assessment of the sustainability of household spending has been separated from all other types of financing: government grants, loans, equity, bonds, and donations.

 

For each of these types of funding, we assess the compatibility of the criteria used by the different institutions to allocate their funding to companies in the food chain. The results obtained should be interpreted as an assessment of the explicit intentions of the funding grant providers rather than an evaluation of their actual contribution to the transition.

 

• A large part of public funding is still directed according to criteria that are inconsistent with the transition to a sustainable food system.

• The financing of non-subsidy investments in the food chain is largely opaque and not sufficiently linked to sustainability criteria.

 

As this assessment of financing criteria does not apply to household food expenditures, we explore a methodology that focuses on what is ‘actually’ financed by households.
Due to the dependence of the results of this study on a non consensus indicator, we do not consider them sufficiently robust to determine a share of current total expenditure that
would be ‘sustainable’.

 

Nevertheless, the work carried out allows us to draw the following lesson:

 

• Household food expenditures are still far from the recommendations of the three scenarios.

 

In addition to providing relatively general results, the objective of this working paper is to open the debate about the evaluation of the sustainability of the French food system and in particular, the methodology to be used.

Assessing the sustainability of the French food system: methodological issues and results Download
I4CE Contacts
Hadrien HAINAUT
Hadrien HAINAUT
 Program director – Climate finance, energy transition and forecasting Email
Lucile ROGISSART
Lucile ROGISSART
 Research Fellow – Financing the agricultural transition, Food systems Email
To learn more
  • 01/23/2026 Foreword of the week
    Financing carbon farming practices: lessons learnt in France can reinforce the EU level initiatives

    In a challenging economic and political context, especially for the agriculture sector, some incentive schemes can still help bring stakeholders together in climate transition and resilience initiatives. This is the case with carbon certification schemes, which both ensure the credibility of the climate impact of the actions implemented and provide remuneration for farmers and foresters for changes in practices. Some of these measures, such as replacing mineral fertilisers (mostly imported) with organic fertilisers, also help to meet the sector’s needs for resilience and strategic independence, which are crucial in the current context.

  • 01/16/2026 Blog post
    CBAM and fertilisers: ring-fencing budgets to help farmers reduce their use of mineral fertilisers

    The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) came into force on 1 January 2026. It is a carbon tax applied at the borders of the European Union to imports of certain industrial products covered by the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). Nitrogen-based mineral fertilisers are included in this initial list of products. To avoid an increase in costs for the farmers concerned, the level of the tax has been reduced for fertilisers, and they may even be temporarily excluded from the scope of the CBAM. Yet, for the climate, but also for France’s strategic independence and food sovereignty, the CBAM will ultimately have to be fully applied to mineral fertilisers. To limit or even avoid an increase in farmers’ fertiliser expenditure, we need public policies – some of which are currently under threat. Ring-fencing budgets for these policies would be a way to support farmers’ incomes and the food sovereignty of both the European Union and France, while reducing the carbon footprint of our food system. 

  • 06/12/2025
    Six years of carbon certification in France: an assessment of the Label Bas-Carbone

    Six years after its inception, this study aims to review this mechanism and its projects: what activities are being implemented in the field, what impact are they having on the climate, with what robustness or, on the contrary, what limitations in terms of measurement, environmental integrity, accessibility, etc.? This exercise is also intended to feed into the process of continuous improvement of the scheme and to provide feedback for the current implementation of the European carbon certification framework (Carbon removals and carbon farming: CRCF).

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer