Taking climate-related disclosure to the next level – minimum requirements for financial institutions

20 May 2021 - Climate Report - By : Anuschka HILKE / Romain HUBERT / Alice PAUTHIER / Julie RAYNAUD

In 2015, France pioneered requirements for climate-related disclosure from financial institutions, asking them to explain their strategy for integrating climate-related risks and for contributing to the achievement of the Paris Agreement objectives and the French national low-carbon strategy. Three years of implementation yielded mixed results and requirements are in the course of being updated in France (through the implementing decree of article 29 of the Energy and Climate Act) and in Europe (through the SFDR and other legal acts). 


In context of the regulatory dynamics, I4CE and Institute Louis Bachelier have made proposals for updating climate-related disclosure frameworks in the financial sector. Some of these proposals were taken up by the draft implementing decree for article 29 of the French Energy and Climate Act that was released for consultation in February 2021.


In this I4CE-ILB report, international financial actors, regulators and their stakeholders will find an explanation of the technical specifications in the implementing decree of article 29 as well as other proposals they can build upon to move forward with sustainability and disclosure.


With the goal of improving the quality of information disclosed, the authors of this report recommend clarifications of disclosure frameworks on two aspects: what areas to disclose about and how to disclose information.


Click on this button to see the image



Clarifying what:

Climate action in the financial sector is discussed with concepts that are understood differently depending on the context and this undermines the quality and comparability of the information disclosed. This covers such terms as “alignment”, “contribution”, “impact”, “doing no harm” or “climate-related risks” and connections between each of them. This report precises the commonly agreed aspects of these concepts, while acknowledging that further efforts for clarification are needed.



Clarifying how:

Besides clarifying the ‘what’, it is also the appropriate timing to clarify further how financial actors should explain their approach to integrate climate-related issues.


Since 2015, a lot of methodologies have emerged to help financial actors analyze their portfolio alignment with a low-carbon trajectory and their exposure to climate-related risks. Based on a review of these methodologies, the authors of the report observed emerging good practices. They also observed limitations in the transparency of key hypotheses and in the relevance of data and analytical choices as well as unclear link between analysis and decision-making.


The authors propose a range of minimum quality requirements in disclosure frameworks. They seek to increase transparency on analytical choices, to stimulate financial actors in using state-of-the-art best analytical practices and in demonstrating sustained efforts to push the boundaries of their analyses.


What is climate reporting for financial institutions? Where do we stand with their climate disclosure? Anuschka Hilke of I4CE presents the main findings of the study in two minutes :



Taking climate-related disclosure to the next level – minimum requirements for financial institutions Download
I4CE Contacts
Anuschka HILKE
Anuschka HILKE
Finance Programme director – Financial regulation, Development finance Email
Research Fellow – Climate risks, Adaptation and financial institutions Email
Project Manager – Development finance Email
To learn more
  • 02/16/2024 Foreword of the week
    Mobilising banks in the transition: supervisors must have better use of risk management

    The European Union is continuing its efforts to ensure that the banking system takes climate change into account. Banks will have to draw up a “transition plan”, according to the European Banking Authority’s (EBA) guidelines that are out for consultation until April.  One could hope that the banking authorities would seize this opportunity to encourage banks to better finance the transition, since their voluntary commitments are not sufficient. But the EBA does not make it a clear objective.

  • 02/14/2024
    Connecting the dots between climate risk management and transition finance

    A report to clarify linkages between these two approaches to climate action for the financial sector. The mobilization of the sector is necessary to help to finance the low-carbon transition. Some stakeholders thus advocate the explicit mobilization of the sector in favor of financing the transition. This rationale for action is known as the “transition finance approach”. The sector is also exposed to the financial risks arising from climate change and the necessary transition. This observation motivates a rationale for action known as te “risk approach”, aimed at managing the exposure of financial institutions to such risks.

  • 01/26/2024 Foreword of the week
    Failing to plan is planning to fail: Prudential transition plans and European Banking Authority consultation

    After nearly 4 years of negotiations, the European Union has just reached an agreement to reform the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) for banks. The inclusion of climate change is a major step forward: banks will have to draw up prudential transition plans, supervised by the European Central Bank. These plans will complement the European regulatory architecture that is being put in place for large companies, with the Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Due Diligences Directive (CSDD). Are these banking transition plans a sufficient breakthrough to finally commit banks to climate neutrality? The answer to this question will depend on the implementation of EU legislation.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !