Which price(s) for carbon ?

21 December 2016 - Foreword of the week - By : Benoît LEGUET

On December 1st, 2016, Benoît Leguet concluded the “Défi Climat” session entitled “Which price(s) for carbon?”. Benoît’s speech was devoted to the social value of carbon, as defined in the Paris Agreement, and its links to the price(s) of carbon.

In summary of this speech, consider the following four ideas that justify the need to define a “confidence interval” of social carbon values ​​consistent with the net-zero objective set by the Paris Agreement:

1. Carbon Price signals are necessary but insufficient. There are many obstacles to move forward a low-carbon economy:

  • Carbon prices rather than one carbon price to take account of national and sectoral circumstances and dynamics.
  • Need for strong political signals to avoid ending up in technological and economic “dead ends”.

2. Decarbonising our economy in the short term according to optimal economic choices depends on the long-term objective and speed of implementation

  • Targeting more expensive low-carbon investment options now makes sense: reasoning on average and non-marginal abatement costs.

3. Policy-makers and economic players need a carbon value “compass” to guide investment decisions:

  • Role of the social value of carbon to make the policy framework more coherent and effective
  • Towards an operational declination of this carbon social value (states, communities, companies …).

4. To meet this need, a “confidence interval” for carbon values ​​should be institutionalized to coordinate short-term decisions towards the end point of the low-carbon transition.

  • The Stern-Stiglitz Commission, launched in November 2016, will deliver the first recommendations expected in April 2017
I4CE Contacts
Managing Director Email
To learn more
  • 11/29/2023 Blog post
    Climate finance: multiplying the numbers will not solve the equation alone

    Much of the discussions at COP28 will focus the 100 billion USD/year target decided at Copenhagen to support climate investments in the Global South, and on the new climate finance goal set to replace it. But, whilst keeping our eyes on the volumes laid on the table, we also need to look more into the impact of every dollar spent. Identifying and building on the value added of every actor in the economy is essential to avoid overlaps and maximise synergies. Three types of actors have a pivotal role to play in the paradigm shift: governments, public financial institutions and private financial institutions.

  • 11/23/2023
    Appendix – Global carbon accounts – data 2023
  • 11/22/2023 Blog post Foreword of the week
    Carbon prices: the winds of change

    After several years of strong growth, the revenue generated by carbon pricing mechanisms (carbon taxes or markets) worldwide, as reported in our 2023 edition of the Global Carbon Accounts, stabilized at nearly USD 100 billion. This stabilization could not be more deceptive.  The future has rarely been so uncertain for carbon prices, caught between very strong opposing trends, and the next two years could mark a major turning point, for good or bad, for the use of these climate policy instruments worldwide. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !