World bank and IMF Spring Meetings: How can the reformed institutions play a leading role in funding the transition?

19 April 2024 - Foreword of the week - By : Claire ESCHALIER

Rethinking how development can be financed to take into account the rising challenges of our time is a fastidious task, especially when thousands of experts, decision makers and practitioners want to leave their print. The outline of the new international financial architecture is being debated again this week, with more questions open for discussion than consensus on the answers. 

 

 As the World Bank Group and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Spring Meetings are coming to a close, we are turning another page in the chapter on reforming these Bretton Woods institutions, 80 years since their establishment in 1944.

 

How can the reformed institutions play a leading role in funding the transition to a low-emissions, climate-resilient and just future? What comes out of this week’s meetings will help further define the role of some of the protagonists (governments, public and private financial institutions) in channelling financial flows in the right direction.  

 

One essential aspect is the leadership of international financial institutions, and more broadly, public financial institutions, in aligning all financial flows with the objectives set in the Paris Agreement. Together with E3G, NewClimate Institute and Germanwatch, I4CE made its own contribution by publishing a position paper on what an ambitious alignment with Paris Agreement objectives should look like for public financial institutions. Another critical ongoing discussion that I4CE is closely following relates to the impact of some of the instruments that public financial institutions choose to channel public funds where needed. Read our blogpost on how we seize the opportunity to question how financial intermediation can further contribute to financing the climate transition. 

 

Read the newsletter

To learn more
  • 11/28/2025 Foreword of the week
    COP30: The missed turn to implementation – and the coalitions moving ahead anyway

    COP30 concluded with an agreement, proving that multilateralism is still alive. However, the results are underwhelming: no push to transition away from fossil fuels, no decision on deforestation, and mixed outcomes on adaptation metrics.  On climate finance, Belém failed to shift from ambition to implementation. Negotiations quickly drifted back to a battle on yet another high-level quantitative target. The decision to triple adaptation funding by 2035 disappointed many, with its distant time horizon, lack of baseline and non-binding wording. COP30 also missed the opportunity to engage with – and build consensus around – concrete measures outlined in the Baku to Belém roadmap to get to $1.3 trillion. Instead, it defaulted to launching new processes – a work programme on climate finance and a ministerial roundtable on the NCQG.  

  • 11/13/2025
    How solidarity levies can help bridge the climate and development finance gap

    The climate and development finance gap is large and widening, as Official Development Assistance (ODA) declines and needs multiply. With shrinking fiscal space in vulnerable countries, solidarity levies are gaining attention as a predictable source of international finance. Launched at COP28 by Barbados, France, and Kenya, the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force (GSLTF) is the main initiative in this space.

  • 11/12/2025
    Bridging the Finance Gap: Leveraging National and Subnational Public Financial Institutions for Localised Climate and Development Action

    National Public Banks (NPBs) and Subnational Public Financial Institutions (SPFIs), including development banks and agencies as well as climate and green funds at the subnational level, play an increasingly vital role in financing climate action and the just transition. While national governments provide frameworks aligned with nationally determined contributions (NDCs), actual implementation occurs largely at the subnational level, which currently lacks sufficient funding. SPFIs can work as financial intermediaries, as they not only understand local needs and have stronger ties with local governments and businesses, but also access much larger volumes of capital from more diverse sources. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer