Unblocking finance for low-carbon agriculture 

With the entry into force of the European carbon farming certification framework (CRCF), the European Union now has a first-of-its-kind tool to certify climate-friendly agricultural and forestry practices. One thing is now clear: while certification methods are progressing, it is funding that has become the main concern. To structure demand, the Commission is counting on a Buyers’ Club of public and private buyers, and expects the agri-food industry to help finance the transition of their upstream agricultural supply chains. 

 

 

Uncertainty over the rules for claiming credits is presented as a major barrier to financing European agricultural carbon credits. This uncertainty points directly to what is known as “double claiming”: when a farmer engages in a low-carbon project and sells carbon credits to a third party, the agri-food company that sources from them fears being unable to account for those same reductions in its own GHG inventory. As a precaution, many companies then turn away from these projects, and even discourage their suppliers from taking part.

 

 

Our new I4CE study “Double claiming of agricultural carbon credits: time to stop worrying” shows that this fear is largely unfounded. Counting a physical emissions reduction in one’s inventory and funding it are two separate things, and they can coexist: clarifying European regulation would be enough to remove the ambiguity. We hope this work will add a useful voice to the debate. 

 

Alongside this publication, we are releasing two further contributions: 

  • Recommendations for certifying improved forest management, as work on a CRCF methodology in this area gets underway, amid concern over the capacity of the European forest carbon sink. 
  • A policy brief on best practices for the future Buyers’ Club for European agricultural carbon credits. 

 

These contributions share one conviction: scaling up low-carbon agricultural and forestry practices depends as much on solid public and private financing as on pragmatic and transparent rules. 

 

 

Read the newsletter

To learn more
  • 02/19/2026 Blog post
    Food sovereignty relies on ecological planning

    The upcoming food sovereignty conferences are likely to shape debates on the future of French agriculture in 2026. The main responses provided over the past two years can be summarised as follows: remove production constraints to produce more of everything (both animal and plant products), to recover market shares in France and abroad. Seeking to produce more of everything without considering adaptation or transition is a form of denial, at a time when climate change is hitting farmers hard and regularly, and when our dependence on imported fertilisers and oilseed meals undermines our sovereignty. The conferences must take these considerations into account — otherwise, they will serve only to perpetuate the notion of an illusory sovereignty. 

  • 02/19/2026
    Which production assets for more resilient and sustainable agricultural and food sectors? Which investment needs? Which stranded assets?

    Les choix d’investissements des secteurs agricoles et alimentaires des années à venir sont déterminants. Pour pérenniser leurs productions et faire face aux crises, les secteurs agricoles et alimentaires français doivent évoluer vers des systèmes plus résilients et durables. L’enjeu est d’autant plus crucial que différentes vagues d’investissements sont en cours ou à venir dans ces secteurs. Dans cette étude, I4CE a estimé qu’environ 100 milliards d’euros d’outils de production agricoles et alimentaires sont affectés par la transition. Une coordination et une planification des investissements semblent incontournables, notamment pour en limiter les coûts.

  • 01/23/2026 Foreword of the week
    Financing carbon farming practices: lessons learnt in France can reinforce the EU level initiatives

    In a challenging economic and political context, especially for the agriculture sector, some incentive schemes can still help bring stakeholders together in climate transition and resilience initiatives. This is the case with carbon certification schemes, which both ensure the credibility of the climate impact of the actions implemented and provide remuneration for farmers and foresters for changes in practices. Some of these measures, such as replacing mineral fertilisers (mostly imported) with organic fertilisers, also help to meet the sector’s needs for resilience and strategic independence, which are crucial in the current context.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer