Publications Agriculture and food

Will the obligation of environmental results green the CAP?

19 June 2020 - Climate Report - By : Thomas BONVILLAIN / Claudine FOUCHEROT / Valentin BELLASSEN

One of the main elements of the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) for the 2021-2027 exercise is the shift of part of the funding towards an obligation to achieve environmental results. Is that an expensive development? Environmentally effective? In order to answer these questions, this I4CE study analyses numerous mechanisms, more or less oriented towards performance obligation. 


First of all, the study shows that the distinction between the obligation of means and the obligation of result, or performance obligation, is too manichean. Pure performance requirements in the environmental field never really exist, the practical examples are placed on a continuum of more or less fine estimated results.


Estimating the costs of six schemes located on this continuum (Green Payment, Agro-Environmental and Climate Measure, aid for conversion to organic farming, High Environmental Value label and two carbon certification standards) then allows several conclusions to be drawn. First of all, the obligation of result is not necessarily more costly than the obligation of means: AECM for example, generally considered as obligations of means, is more expensive to administer than carbon certification frameworks, considered as obligations of results. The genericity of the system plays an essential role, allowing the costs of design and monitoring to be spread over a large number of farmers.


Secondly, with regard to the effectiveness of the instrument in terms of environmental impact, moving towards an obligation of result does not seem to be decisive as such. However, two factors are crucial: the ambition of the scheme and the level of requirement on additionality, for example by making the subsidy conditional on an improvement over an initial state.


Finally, the specific interest of the transition to the obligation of results seems to be the facilitation of the CAP environmental assessment, which would make it possible to redirect subsidies, if necessary, in the light of these impact data which are currently lacking.


The CAP reform opens up the possibility of introducing new types of payments under the 1st pillar eco-scheme and, in particular, carbon certification frameworks. They pay a lot of attention to the issue of additionality. Being neither more costly to put in place nor less effective than a AECM-type instrument, they could make their appearance within the CAP. The example of support for organic farming shows that supporting CAP support on external labels is not without precedent.


Thomas Bonvillain explains, in two minutes, the main lessons of this study. A video to watch in order to understand what the obligation of results under the CAP is and the interest it arouses.


Will the obligation of environmental results green the CAP? pdf
I4CE Contacts
Research fellow - Agriculture and Forestry Email
Program Director Agriculture and Forestry Email
To learn more
  • 01/27/2022 Blog post
    Remunerating farmers for their stored carbon, Europe’s good idea?

    On December 15, 2021, as part of its communication on carbon sinks, the European Commission made public its proposals to strengthen carbon storage in agricultural soils. Its objective: to remunerate farmers to encourage them to store more carbon. To achieve this, it is first necessary to build a European carbon certification framework to guarantee the […]

  • 01/27/2022
    Design principles of a carbon farming scheme in support of the Farm2Fork & FitFor55 objectives

    In order to reach the objectives of the recently approved EU Climate Law, the agricultural sector has to simultaneously reduce significantly its level of emission, increase the amount of carbon it sequesters, and augment the production of biomass in substitution of fossil fuel – which are to be phased out in the short term. In […]

  • 06/11/2020 Op-ed
    Op-ed I CAP and climate: let’s not be afraid of obligations to achieve results

    In spite of its “greening” during the previous programming period, the Common Agricultural Policy has had very little impact on greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector, even though they must be halved by 2050. And the CAP’s two flagship instruments on environmental issues – green payments under the first pillar, and agri-environmental and climate measures (AECM) under the second – have come in for strong criticism.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !