Landscape of climate finance in France, 2017 Edition

6 December 2017 - Climate Report - By : Hadrien HAINAUT / Lola GOUIFFES / Ian COCHRAN, Phd

To better understand the financing of the fight against climate change and the energy transition, the study identified investments that contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in France. These expenditures are analyzed to identify which actors have undertaken these projects and how they are financed.


Climate investments mainly distributed in three areas of the energy transition


The 2017 edition of the study identified up to 32 billion euros invested in climate areas in France each year between 2013 and 2016. To give an order of magnitude, this represents about 10% of material investments in France this year. This total includes:


  • EUR 14.5 billion in energy efficiency, mainly in the building sector,
  • EUR 5.9 billion for the development of renewable energies,
  • EUR 9.2 billion for the construction and upgrading of sustainable transport and network infrastructure.


Added to this are 2.1 billion euros in nuclear energy and the reduction of non-energy related emissions.


Overall investment stability masking sectoral variations


Between 2011 and 2013, investments increased by EUR 2.6 billion to EUR 32.1 billion. They were stable in 2014, 2015 and 2016 and the first estimates available for 2017 bring the total to 31.5 billion euros.


This overall stability masks more marked variations by domain:

  • Investments in energy efficiency increased between 2011 and 2016, from 11.6 to 14.6 billion euros
  • After increasing by 50% between 2011 and 2013, spending on sustainable infrastructure declined in 2014 and 2015, and has since been stable.
  • Renewable energy investments decreased from 8.6 billion to 5.3 billion euros between 2011 and 2013, and has remained at around this level.


If private actors make the majority of investments, 52% of funding is led by the public sector


The majority of investments were made by private project developers: households, investing 33% or 10.8 billion euros, and businesses 9.8 billion euros, or 31% of the total invested in 2016. However, just over half of the funding mobilized to make investments are linked to public actions and incentives. From 2011 to 2015, the proportion of funding driven by the public sector increased from 48% to 52% of total investments.


To learn more about I4CE’s research on domestic climate finance, visit the Landscape of Domestic Climate Finance project page.

To learn more
  • 06/09/2023 Foreword of the week
    Green Deal: chapter 2

    Emmanuel Macron certainly made a mistake in calling for a European “regulatory pause” on the environment. In the same speech, he however expressed a truth that is essential to the debate: “Europe and France risk being the best-in-class in terms of regulation, and the worst-in-class in terms of financing”. It went unnoticed but, as highlighted in this I4CE newsletter, the time has come for a debate on how the EU can better finance the climate transition. And there is no time like the present! In precisely one year, on June 9th 2024, hundreds of millions of Europeans will vote for a new European Parliament, that will in term elect a new European Commission that will negotiate the future EU budget.

  • 06/08/2023 Blog post
    Climate investment: working with our differences

    How much should France invest in climate action ? Experts from diverse backgrounds have sought to answer this important and seemingly simple question. They agree that France needs to invest more to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. But they differ on the scale of public and private funding needs, which range from €20 to €100 billion a year. Is this a cause for concern? Not really, because the experts are not counting the same thing. These differences can be explained and should not be used as an excuse for inaction.

  • 06/08/2023 Blog post
    Can France finance the transition only with budget savings?

    How does the government plan to finance the increase in its public spending on climate action? Further to the government’s reactions to the Pisani-Ferry report, which proposes using all options, including debt and tax increases, let us make an assumption: what if the government were to rely solely on budget saving options? I4CE’s Damien Demailly reviews the savings options available to the government. Clearly, they are all difficult to implement and some may prove counterproductive. They are nevertheless on the government’s agenda and are worth explaining and discussing, as are all options to finance the transition.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !